On Tuesday 29 Apr 2008 3:02:34 pm Amaya wrote:
> > "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
> > X is a counter starting at 1."
>
> I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
> what is the consensuous regarding this increment? Where to incre
James Vega wrote:
> "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
> X is a counter starting at 1."
I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
what is the consensuous regarding this increment? Where to increment?
I hope I made myself understood
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:34AM +0200, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Vega wrote:
> > "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
> > X is a counter starting at 1."
>
> I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
> what is the con
* Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a NMU should never, ever, create a new
tarball, particularly apply
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> > but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
>
> 100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a NMU should never, ever, create a new
> tarb
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> > FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> > but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
> 100% agreed. (Assuming you me
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> someversion+nmu1, someversion+nmu2 for example see, bzflag package. It
> is at 2.0.10.20071115+nmu1 right now.
Thanks, that answers my question.
--
·''`. Come, let me sing into your ear, those dancing days are gone
: :' : I carry the sun in a golden cup, the moon
* Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> > > FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> > > but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether i
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:01:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> > > > FWIW, I think NMUing a packag
With the upload of debian-maintainers version 1.30, the following
changes to the keyring have been made:
dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full name: Sylvestre Ledru
Added key: DEE63CAACE54B9B27DDCD34A88E5D733DD899610
A summary of all the changes in this upload follows.
Debian distribution maintenanc
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:44:59AM +0200, Lawrence Sanders wrote:
> I have not used deb in years. Boy am i stupid. Thank you so much for a
> great OS. I vow to never use RH or fedora again.
> lawsan
While the package format is great, it also takes a bit of human
intelligence to make everything work
* Raphael Hertzog [Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:16:34 +0200]:
> (reply-to set to debian-devel only)
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
> > "The version must be the version of the last
12 matches
Mail list logo
