Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: >> The following changes to the Debian keyring have been made: > May I guess that this good news is somehow connected to [1]? > If yes, thanks once more to our former DPL! I don't see any evi

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 05:31:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Over the past few years (2005, 2006 and 2007 at least), there's been a > keyring update during the DPL election period; this one's not long after > that. It might likewise be correlated with the Ubuntu .04 releases. A German would be

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 05:31:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /srv/keyring.debian.org/pub/keyrings/ > total 28056 > -rw-r--r-- 1 troup root 25393210 Apr 17 19:13 debian-keyring.gpg > -rw-r--r-- 1 troup root 949211 Apr 17 19:13 debian-keyring.pgp > -rw-r--r-- 1 troup

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: I don't see any evidence of it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /srv/keyring.debian.org/pub/keyrings/ total 28056 -rw-r--r-- 1 troup root 25393210 Apr 17 19:13 debian-keyring.gpg -rw-r--r-- 1 troup root 949211 Apr 17 19:13 debian-keyring.pgp -rw-r--r-- 1 t

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > H, what really concerns me is that I do not even see evidence > that the fact stated in [1] is even implemented. Here is the evidence: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ groups joerg | grep -q debadmin && echo '\o/' \o/ ( though it has n

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: H, what really concerns me is that I do not even see evidence that the fact stated in [1] is even implemented. Here is the evidence: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ groups joerg | grep -q

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On 18/04/08 at 09:58 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> I don't see any evidence of it: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /srv/keyring.debian.org/pub/keyrings/ >> total 28056 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 troup root 25393210 Apr 17 19:13 debian-keyring.gpg >> -rw-r--r-- 1

Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

With the upload of debian-maintainers version 1.28, the following changes to the keyring have been made: dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full name: Stephane Glondu Added key: 467FC0C018311E9479465FC7060F2876FCE03DAA A summary of all the changes in this upload follows. Debian distribution maintenanc

COMPUTEX TAIPEI e-Newsletter

*Registration News* Buyer Pre-Registration

Re: infrastructure team procedures (fifth edit)

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:46:16AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > The Debian Prject clarifies that all privileged roles held on debian.org > machines are to be considered delegations by the DPL according to the > constitution, § > > as long as we trust ourselves not to elect DPLs going nuts

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > So I fail to see how the current setup enables joerg to change > the keyring which means things are not fully implemented - in whatever It does not (well, AFAIK it does not). According to my reading, the delegations were not related

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: It does not (well, AFAIK it does not). According to my reading, the delegations were not related to keyring management. Ahhh, you are completely right! In my happyness I thought all our problems were solved. Perhaps they are in a way that if so

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

> The keyring part isn't as easy. The problem is that the keyring isn't > maintained collaboratively. jetring has been developed for exactly > this use case, but I've heard (discussion on #debian-devel) that some > people considered jetring "a mess" (I don't have details about > specific problems t

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The keyring part isn't as easy. The problem is that the keyring isn't > maintained collaboratively. jetring has been developed for exactly this > use case, but I've heard (discussion on #debian-devel) that some people > considered jetring "a mess" (I don't have details about

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

Jonathan McDowell wrote: > jetring has some useful and interesting ideas, but the main complaint > I'd have about it as a method of managing keyrings is that it takes on > various roles that are already provided by the underlying VCS and this > duplication makes it more complex than necessary. Thi

Re: Updated Debian Developers Keyring

Joey Hess wrote: > Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > jetring has some useful and interesting ideas, but the main > > complaint I'd have about it as a method of managing keyrings is that > > it takes on various roles that are already provided by the > > underlying VCS and this duplication makes it more c