Re: infrastructure team rules (second edit)

2007-10-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Josip Rodin wrote: > Proposed general resolution - Project infrastructure team procedures I like this reworked version. It's definitely better than the first one. I have nothing particular to add. > * Infrastructure teams should ensure that they don't have too many members. >

Re: infrastructure team rules (second edit)

2007-10-19 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Clint Adams wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:50:29PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: >> * Infrastructure teams have to decide to accept or reject candidates who >> nominated themselves. The basic requirements are: > > Why should teams decide on their own membership? I don't think this > should be a

Re: infrastructure team rules (second edit)

2007-10-19 Thread Clint Adams
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:50:29PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > * Infrastructure teams have to decide to accept or reject candidates who > nominated themselves. The basic requirements are: Why should teams decide on their own membership? I don't think this should be allowed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: infrastructure team rules (second edit)

2007-10-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:01:56AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:50:29PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > * Infrastructure teams have to decide to accept or reject candidates who > > nominated themselves. The basic requirements are: > > Why should teams decide on their own