Hi Guillem,
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 08:11 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Right now there's no clean way for a Debian derivative to close bugs
> specific to their distro in a changelog entry and then distinguish
> those from Debian bugs.
Yes, "for a Debian derivative".
> I'd like that developers fro
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:11:01AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> foo (1.0-2naibed2) quux; urgency=low, origin=naibed
> foo (1.0-2naibed1) quux; urgency=low, origin=naibed
> foo (1.0-2) unstable; urgency=high
Neat.
Presumably Debian should REJECT uploads with an Origin: field other than
"debian",
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Bart Martens wrote:
> I don't think that the Debian project should lead this discussion.
We are the origin of the tools, and we are the "upstream" for them, so
*yes*, we are to be part of, and maybe even lead this discussion.
> No, I don't think that Debian is responsible for
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Presumably Debian should REJECT uploads with an Origin: field other than
> "debian", no?
Might be nice, on the other hand...
> Would it be more pleasant to have something like:
>> foo (1.0-2naibed1) naibed/quux; urgency=low
> instead?
...wouldn't something like this amount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian should use
>something like RSA tokens to control access to Debian resources.
I'd love to, but I do not know any which is even close to be really
free-as-in-freedom.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian should use
> >something like RSA tokens to control access to Debian resources.
> I'd love to, but I do not know any which is even close to be re
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:59:52 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:11:01AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> foo (1.0-2naibed2) quux; urgency=low, origin=naibed foo
>> (1.0-2naibed1) quux; urgency=low, origin=naibed foo (1.0-2)
>> unstable; urgency=high
> Neat.
> Presumably Deb
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> No, please don't/ It is one thing to patch dpkg to make things
> easier for the derivatives (on the other hand, they can patch their
> own version of dpkg), it is another to change how uplaods work in
> Debian, or to reject uploads to Debian because one forgot a
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:47:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian should use
> > >something like RSA tokens to control access to Debian resou
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:11:01AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> * Using a different "Closes:" name, which just sidetracks the issue
>if every derivative have to use a different name, this does not
>scale. (Example: Maemo uses "Fixes:" instead of "Closes:" [1],
>and there's a proposal
All,
I'd like to sign the statement as well.
Hans-Georg Bork
- debian user since the early days of hamm -
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:32:10AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I don't think they would be trivial to replicate. The genuine RSA token is a
> small sealed card with a keypad, a display and a battery that lasts up
> to 3 years. They are small so as to be portable and convenient, which DDs
> will
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:32:10AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:47:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'm inclined to agree with Russell Coker[1], in that Debian s
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:32:10AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I don't think they would be trivial to replicate. The genuine RSA token is a
> small sealed card with a keypad, a display and a battery that lasts up
> to 3 years. They are small so as to be portable and convenient, which DDs
> wil
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:58:38PM +, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> I don't see what's so wrong with a smart card or so. GnuPG cards do
> exist already, and is it so much to need a card reader? If the
> project is shelling out the money anyway they could easily include the
> card readers too.
15 matches
Mail list logo
