"Debian Powered" Logo

#include * Raphael Hertzog [Wed, Jun 28 2006, 12:17:45PM]: > > 9. It would be great if Ubuntu could advertise a bit more its Debian > > correlation by putting Debian logos in CD covers, background images, > > installer splashscreen, etc. Some kind of "Trademark policy" needs to be > > worked out

New Maintainers

This is a summary of the AM reports for the first semester of 2006. 36 applicants became maintainers. Marcela Tiznado I've started using Gnu/Linux on 1998. Im an active member of CaFeLug (Capital Federal GNU/Linux User Group) since 2002. I've worked on some projects like a Wifi Lan along Bu

Re: "Debian Powered" Logo

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Mark Shuttleworth discussed this point with the DPL, and also with several > > other DD and we explained that the "Open use logo" has been precisely > > meant for this kind of use and that they can go ahead. > > What about creating a logo for a strategy

Re: "Debian Powered" Logo

Raphael Hertzog wrote: Indeed, that's why it's great that Ubuntu is ready to make it more obvious that they are Debian based. I very much agree. I never had a problem with the fact that Canonical is willing to capitalize improvements to Debian. I never cared for their "de-branding" of Debian

Re: "Debian Powered" Logo

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > What about creating a logo for a strategy similar to the Intel Inside > campain? I imagine a simple circle of letters "Debian Powered" (in > Debian-red) around the Swirl. Something like this ?

Re: Minutes of an Ubuntu-Debian discussion that happened at Debconf

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I've been working on this specifically. The idea is to create an Ubuntu team which would interact by volunteer DD more closely (filing bugs for their packages in the BTS for all relevant issues, for example). On the other hand, the DD would have to act promptly on those bugs

Re: "Debian Powered" Logo

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:14:03PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote: > The Ubuntu site says that ubuntu means "I am what I am because of who we > all are". If Ubuntu is ready to live up that slogan and publicly > acknowledge that it is what it is *because* of its Debian origins, > rather than despite

Re: "Debian Powered" Logo

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:14:03PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote: > I never cared for their "de-branding" of Debian's work Well, it's not like they had a whole lot of choice in the matter. I have long felt that we should make it easy for third-parties to "rebrand" Debian. That would encourage peo

Re: Minutes of an Ubuntu-Debian discussion that happened at Debconf

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Ean Schuessler wrote: > >This is detailed in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DCT and > >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DCT/Proposal . However, this hasn't been > >discussed (enough) with others Ubuntu developers, and I won't have time > >to work on this in the next weeks. So, if somebody want

Re: "Debian Powered" Logo

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:44:41AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > In particular, Ubuntu has received harsh criticism from Debian developers in > the past for pointing out that they are, in effect, contributors to the > Ubuntu project. That's because "contributor" has different connotations to "ori

Unbranding Debian? (was: Re: "Debian Powered" Logo)

> If we made it easy to rebrand Debian, that would encourage people to > resell it, and it would give us some control over how that rebranding > was done, allowing us to encourage them to promote themselves AND us! This is actually what has been made by the D-I team. Most parts of D-I are now unb