On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 12:12 +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I disagree that having more web based discussion forums for Debian is
> necessarily a good idea. The more forums you have, to more dispersed the
> people discussing Debian online are, and the more work it is for people
> to follow all the r
Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> I've always wondered why these so-called forums are perceived as
> something different than a mailing list or a news group. I've never been
> able to wrap my head around why they aren't just web-based clients for
> reading a set of mailing lists or news groups.
>
> Does so
[ Bcc'ed to -project, -devel and -legal, any further discussion and/or
seconds on -vote, please. ]
After reading all the recent posts about the GFDL on debian-vote, I
hereby propose the following General Resolution and ask for seconds.
--8<--
The Debian Project asserts that
Works licensed under
"JW" == Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JW> Since binary-level compatibility is not a goal of Ubuntu
JW> (nor IMO should it be; down that path lies madness), they
JW> modify every package in a very important sense.
Even if binary compatibility were a goal, that doesn't mean that
th
Dear Webmaster,
We are interested in the possibility of exchanging links with your site,
http://dmoz.org/.
We have already added the following details to the category Other > Web
Directories on our links page at http://www.mycasinoplanet.com/partners/ :
Name: Open Directory - Sports: Greyhou
On Sunday 22 January 2006 13:06, Matt Jakse wrote:
> I am trying to install a nvidia driver. The driver is for a nvidia
> geforce 5200. Every time i go to install it i get this message: You
> appear to be running an X server; please exit X before installing.
> How do you exit X? and is there any
On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:38, Mark Daher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Mark Daher, owner of LinuxForums.org , I would like to make
> my site the official forums of the Debian since there aren't any,
> helping people with Debian, etc.
You didn't try hard, did you? The official forums are at
ht
On Sunday 22 January 2006 11:27, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > So I think we should be very careful whether we officially adopt a web
> > forum as part of our support. If we did so, we will have to be present
> > and mediate/moderate trou
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
> Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
> libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
> they share the same source. Hence having Ubuntu developers triage the
> bugs to rule out such
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> > Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
> > libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
> > they share the same sou
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
> > Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
> > libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
> > they share the same sourc
Paul Johnson writes:
> Given Ubuntu hopelessly complicates everything, pretends there is
> cooperation where there is none, and merely duplicates the effort of the
> debian-desktop project, and contributes nothing to the community or
> society...
Do you have evidence to support this, or is it just
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> > Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
> > libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
> > they share the same sou
13 matches
Mail list logo
