On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Chris Waters wrote:
> The Debian project itself provides advertising opportunities through
> its mailing lists and bug tracking system, though, so one could argue
> that there is ample precedent. :)
Actually, the BTS and the lists are handled very differently.
The crap is usua
Am 2005-01-08 12:13:43, schrieb Santiago Vila:
> Actually, the BTS and the lists are handled very differently.
> The crap is usually removed from the BTS as soon as it's detected.
> I wish we did the same for the lists archives.
I am subscribed to more then 70 Mailinglists since 2000 and
gotten m
It's becomingly increasingly common for hardware to require firmware to
be loaded by the device driver on boot, rather than containing it in
ROM. This is unfortunate, because in most cases the firmware is
non-free. As a result, a naive application of policy suggests that
drivers which require this
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:36:03AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> An alternative would be to leave non-free firmware in non-free, but not
> to enforce the requirement that drivers depending on it end up in
> contrib. This is possibly the most straight forward, and by squinting
> funny we could po
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I have a problem, conceptually, with a kernel package which
> provides drivers for 10,000 different types of hardware, and needs to load
> firmware from disk for 300 of them, being in main (without a
> Depends:/Recommends: relationship on t
5 matches
Mail list logo
