On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:31:52PM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> Within our project, if you consider the most effective DDs*, you're
> going to also be thinking of the most reasonable, thoughtful, and
> friendly ones.
No, I'd say that's entirely wrong. The rest of your mail was based on
similarly
On 2004-03-22 21:52:52 + Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't want people to say "this might be suboptimal" instead of "this
is crap", because then I won't be able to tell the difference between
things that are crap and things that are suboptimal. I *want* to know
when somethi
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:42:47AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Hey, sure. It's impossible not to offend anyone. But it's always
> > possible to deal with people politely and respectfully. How they react
> > is their own business.
> That attitude was the cause of the Earth-Minbari war.
And h
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:09:48AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-03-22 21:52:52 + Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I don't want people to say "this might be suboptimal" instead of "this
> >is crap", because then I won't be able to tell the difference between
> >things that a
> "AS" == Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Me> Within our project, if you consider the most effective DDs*,
Me> you're going to also be thinking of the most reasonable,
Me> thoughtful, and friendly ones.
AS> No, I'd say that's entirely wrong.
I'd say that you're be
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:14:52AM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> AS> The rest of your mail was based on similarly dumb ideas.
>
> Which ideas do I have that are so dumb?
> That you shouldn't be mean when you don't have to?
Yes, that's hippie shit.
If you s/shouldn't/don't need to/ then it'
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:28:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:14:52AM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> > AS> The rest of your mail was based on similarly dumb ideas.
> >
> > Which ideas do I have that are so dumb?
>
> > That you shouldn't be mean when you don't h
Evan Prodromou wrote:
>> "AS" == Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AS> Sure, and that's best accomplished by everybody not being a
> AS> wuss.
>
> It doesn't make you a wuss to be respectful to others. Quite the
> contrary: the strong know their own strength and don't n
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If people address issues rather than personalitites then everything
> you have said is completely irrelevant, because they aren't going to
> be perturbed by the "speech" pattern of the people they are talking
> to, so we can phrase things however we damn well please.
You'r
당사 메일서버에 설치된 V3 백신에서, debian-project@lists.debian.org
님이 보낸 메일을 검사한 결과,
바이러스 감염이 확인되었으며 다음과 같이 정책에 따라 처리하였습니다.
(Win32/Netsky.worm.17424 바이러스는 메일의 [보낸 사람] 계정을 속일 수 있으므로
실제 보낸 사용자 계정과 다를 수 있습니다.)
궁금한 사항은 관리자에게 문의하시기 바랍니다
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:56:15AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> One of the things Bruce did (before my time, I think) was ban people from
> the lists, or convert them to "daily digest mode" for not acting with
> an appropriate amount of decorum. I can't imagine a DPL getting away
> with trying
11 matches
Mail list logo
