Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:44:31PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > - On a talk at Madrid, Miguel de Icaza who is a close friend of mine
> > BTW, used female secretaries as examples of clueless users.
>
> Well, that's probably because that's empirically proven to be correct...
But p
>> I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just like we have one
>> for gnome and kde.
> I think this is a good idea. Would it start by being populated with
> anything depending on gnustep*, or did I not think that through? What
> packages would that give?
Yep, this would also help me hav
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:57:46AM +0100, G?rkan Seng?n wrote:
> >> I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just like we have one
> >> for gnome and kde.
> > I think this is a good idea. Would it start by being populated with
> > anything depending on gnustep*, or did I not think that thr
> On topic: I don't really think a section for this few packages is worth
> it.
I think it is worth because
gnustep *clearly* does not belong in the x11 section.
> Package count (binary, unstable of two days ago, without contrib and
> non-free) is below, and it shows that even the smallest section
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:54:38AM +0100, G?rkan Seng?n wrote:
> > Package count (binary, unstable of two days ago, without contrib and
> > non-free) is below, and it shows that even the smallest section has nearly
> > 300 packages.
> Nice try butc can you tell me how you got to that numbers, exact
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> > On topic: I don't really think a section for this few packages is worth
> > it.
> I think it is worth because
> gnustep *clearly* does not belong in the x11 section.
>
> > Package count (binary, unstable of two days ago, without contrib and
> > non-free) is below, and it s
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:15:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> This invalidates my argument, although 47 (or 90 as you estimate)
> packages with 'gnustep' in the description (apt-cache search gnustep|wc
> -l) is still less than 263 (gnome) or 212 (kde) packages, it isn't
> unlike the smal
> What do you think about counting wmaker and all its apps also as gnustep
> applications?
They depend on X, which GNUstep applications don't. Personally
I would not put them into the gnustep section, also because
they do not use the GNUstep framework. However they can be recommended
or suggested
Hello, My name is Tobi See and IM looking for sponsors for my children Elisha and Jacob See for and model&talent calendar with John Casablanca's model and talent management in Nashville,Tennessee.They have been selected to be September in 2005 calander.The company that sponsors my children will rec
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:45:50PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 05:47:25PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > To our users who were used to quality packages from accountable
> > > maintainers even if the software wasn't 100% DFSG-compliant: bummer, man.
> >
> > Out of date in n
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:44:31PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
>> - On a talk at Madrid, Miguel de Icaza who is a close friend of mine
>> BTW, used female secretaries as examples of clueless users.
I'd have used bosses -- come on, doesn't anyone read Dilbert?
I know specifically of
11 matches
Mail list logo
