Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:39:17PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> With our underlying culture, I'm not sure if any attempts to change us will
>> truly ever succeed in making us the caring, sharing, non-confrontational
>> group that will make every person happy to work
Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> I can demonstrate evidence that I'm not a gerbil quite handily.
>
> No you can't, because you're a gerbil and gerbils can't form rational
> arguments. It is logically impossible for you to disprove this,
> because your burden-of-proof notion is backwards (in formal l
Hi, Jonathan Walther wrote:
>>1. Don't pander to us just because we're women.
>
> Why not? There are standards of civility, and those standards include
> acting like a gentleman.
... towards *everybody*, not just towards women.
Which is exactly her point.
--
Matthias Urlichs
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:19:02AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
1. Don't pander to us just because we're women.
Why not? There are standards of civility, and those standards include
acting like a gentleman.
... towards *everybody*, not just towards women.
Which is exactly her point.
Gen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:04:58AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
People cannot usefully participate in a debate unless they grow a
skin, or while they are emotionally attached to an argument.
True, assuming ...
Providing
crutches for them will only make things worse.
... that it's an argum
Hi. Sorry to bother you but i looked a lot to the page but I can't find
the info that i'm looking for.
I want to know what version of the packages or programs is packed with
different versions.
I downloaded the woody distro (cd's 1,2 and 3) and it has kde 3 or less
i guess.
I want to know what v
[Ricardo S]
> Hi. Sorry to bother you but i looked a lot to the page but I can't find
> the info that i'm looking for.
For future reference, a better place to ask this sort of question is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I want to know what version of the packages or programs is packed
> with different ver
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:05:54PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less expectation
> than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for instance, would not
> think to lift a fellow man over a rain puddle, but would instantly offer
> such assis
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:05:54PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less
expectation than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for
instance, would not think to lift a fellow ma
Jonathan Walther wrote:
> >... towards *everybody*, not just towards women.
> >
> >Which is exactly her point.
>
> Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less expectation
> than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for instance, would not
> think to lift a fellow man over a rain
[Jonathan Walther]
> Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less
> expectation than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for
> instance, would not think to lift a fellow man over a rain puddle,
> but would instantly offer such assistance to a lady.
I know it has not escaped you
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about recomends and suggests of contrib or non-free packages from
> > debian/main ?
>
> How should it handle it?
Well, i would say that recomends and suggests fr
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:10:54AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> >> I can demonstrate evidence that I'm not a gerbil quite handily.
> >
> > No you can't, because you're a gerbil and gerbils can't form rational
> > arguments. It is logically impossible for you to
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:37:54AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less
expectation than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for
instance, would not think to lift a fellow man over a rain puddle,
but would instantly offer such assistance to
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:25:32AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What about recomends and suggests of contrib or non-free packages from
> > > debian/main ?
> >
> > H
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:22:28AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:25:32AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > What about recomends and sugges
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 03:25:53AM -0300, Ricardo S wrote:
> Hi. Sorry to bother you but i looked a lot to the page but I can't find
> the info that i'm looking for.
debian-project is not the proper mailing list for this kind of question.
But you can find the info in http://www.de.debian.org/dis
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:22:28AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:25:32AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > What about recomends and sugges
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:36:49PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> [-devel and -vote CCed. Please respect the Mail-Followup-To -project.
> You should really subscribe to -project, it's not that big. In any case,
> I will try read and reply to any comment]
I think this is relevant to debian-vote too,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:21:21PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:25:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:44:23AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > > That would be a godsend. It would work, too. It's happening already:
> > > a lot of people
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:38:47PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I suspect some of our users might not want to use packages from a
> less trusted source. I would have concerns myself.
Of course, and this was indeed one the prime design requirements. Do
you feel your concerns are adequately addr
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:43:59PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> I'd take a bullet for my wife, my mother, my sisters, but never for
> a feminist.
Just in case there is a misunderstanding here, this is what dict-wn
has to say about feminism:
feminist
adj : of or relating to or advocating
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:14:48AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:05:54PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> >>Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less
> >>expectation than they do thei
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:38:31AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
To the contrary, it is equalitarians that treat people inhumanely;
expecting too much of some, and denigrating the abilities of others. Do
you expect a man to bear ch
Slighty off-topic but perhaps of interest to someone here.
- Forwarded message from jeremy hunsinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: jeremy hunsinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [F/OSS-Discuss] PhD Scholarship at ITU: Open Source MMOG Development
Date: Wed, 10 Ma
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:03:42AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:38:31AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >>On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> >>To the contrary, it is equalitarians that treat people inhumanely;
> >>expecting too much of
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:26:54AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I don't see the point of your ongoing uterine fixation in this discussion.
It doesn't seem to support your argument. "Women bear children, and men do
not, and therefore I am paying them a favour in treating them as
intellectually an
EOT. *plonk*
--
- mdz
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 15:15, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:21:21PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:25:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:44:23AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg
> > > > That would be a godsend. It would w
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:36:18PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Paul Hampson wrote:
>
> > This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
> > use, duplication and distribution.
> > ---
>
> This email is non-DFSG
Pascal Hakim dijo [Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:39:39PM +1100]:
> > > This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
> > > use, duplication and distribution.
> > > ---
> >
> > This email is non-DFSG. We need to remove it from the list
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:26:51PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Pascal Hakim dijo [Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:39:39PM +1100]:
> > > > This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
> > > > use, duplication and distribution.
> > > > ---
> Neither of those two documents say that we will keep all postings on
> the archives, or that we will remove them, they just say that we will
> if we want to.
Ummm...
All emails sent to the lists are distributed both to the list
subscribers and copied to the public archive, for people to b
33 matches
Mail list logo
