[ Please leave me CC'ed ]
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My original point was that people who do not actually exercise
> their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set -- and need
> to be looked at to see if they are indeed inactive. Having inactive
> members is
>> On 24 Mar 2003 15:17:52 -0800,
>> David N Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [ Please leave me CC'ed ]
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My original point was that people who do not actually exercise
>> their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set -- and
>> n
2 matches
Mail list logo
