* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021017 00:51]:
> > In particular, I note that you seem to be grinding your axe about the
> > issue from Bug#97671.
>
> No, you do me a disservice. That was not Debian's first severity war
> and it probably won't be the last.
>
For new Developers the text
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021103 23:38]:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:19:44PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > FUD! FUD FUD FUD FUD!!! This is completely all wrong. Recently a talk
> > was given at MIT by one of the designers of Microsoft Palladium (their
> > trusted computing in
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:35:17AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote:
> Luckily, if this happens to x86 some day, everyone in 'Free' communities
> will have a damn good reason to leave this platform in droves. :)
From what I've read, this won't actually work: TCPA enabled systems will
still run obsoleted op
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:34:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > If there are people out there apart from Branden and Manoj who
> > disagree with me about anything to do with this document (or indeed
> > about anything at all in Debian!), I'd like to encourage them to mail
> > me about it. I
hi,
i was just wondering why apt-get update /apt-get upgrade wont update ANY
files since lets say about 2 months? are there new source.lists or is there
no update anymore?
just me, J.D.
..::drowning in my tears again::..
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:29:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> * enough content providers to think the mechanism is effective,
> to make it so that if you don't have it you miss out on lots of
> cool stuff. Try spending a couple of weeks without, say, mp3s,
> flash,
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:00, ..::jdb78::.. wrote:
> hi,
>
> i was just wondering why apt-get update /apt-get upgrade wont update ANY
> files since lets say about 2 months? are there new source.lists or is there
> no update anymore?
I presume apt-get updzte reported some errors. What did they s
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:00, ..::jdb78::.. wrote:
>hi,
>
>i was just wondering why apt-get update /apt-get upgrade wont update ANY
>files since lets say about 2 months? are there new source.lists or is there
>no update anymore?
I presume apt-get updzte reported some erro
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> >I presume apt-get updzte reported some errors. What did they say?
>
>
> Or your source.list point to a obsolete mirror.
> Check http://www.debian.org/mirror/list and ev.
> update your source.list file
Or you're running woody..
Martijn
--
Ik BE
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Martijn van de Streek wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2002, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
> > >I presume apt-get updzte reported some errors. What did they say?
> >
> >
> > Or your source.list point to a obsolete mirror.
> > Check http://www.debian.org/mirror/list and ev.
> > update your
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:06:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> -A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, the
> -Project Leader and the Bug Tracking System Administrators.
> +A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, and the
> +Project Leader.
As lo
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:30:20PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
AS> [Things written in flash are usually devoid of content.
I generally agree with your sentiment against all these proprietary
media formats, but I'd also like to point out that, while we have Ogg
Vorbis (and now Tarkin), we don't
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:06:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> -A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, the
> -Project Leader and the Bug Tracking System Administrators.
> +A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, and the
> +Project Leader.
Well,
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> b) I objected to document being written apparently with the
>> ratification of the *technical* committee, despite this not
>> being a technical issue; and that too was dismissed with ``it is
>> important to do so''; despite no other member
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> Given no evidence to assume that it is, though, maybe we
Anthony> shouldn't leap to it as a conclusion just yet?
For the record, I am afraid of disagreeing publicly with aj.
manoj
--
Be self-reliant and your success is assured.
M
>>"Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matt> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:06:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> -A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, the
>> -Project Leader and the Bug Tracking System Administrators.
>> +A *DRAFT* joint recommendation
Thank you very much for your help. i got woody with 2.4.18 kernel and the
following /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main con
Hi
for several weeks now I am dealing with the different methods of downloading
the official cd images of the debian distribution. The hundred of mirrors
containing the debian packages are clearly separated into those, which are
located in the US, and those, which are not, because of the non-u
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:27:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Ian> I'm going to digress here somewhat on the `lurkers support me in
> Ian> email' question:
>
> I a going to outright reject that these hypothetical lurkers
> have any bearing on a public social document that is suppose
Si ce message vous importune et ne plus en recevoir.
allez sur: http://www.freevisit.net/maillistregions/gestion.html
et Mille pardons pour ce désagrément
Gérard
Pour vous désabonner, allez sur
:http://www
20 matches
Mail list logo
