So when is someone of the "qmail is unacceptable because DJB's
in-practice license grant does not meet strict qualifications" camp
going to write an equivalent drop-in replacement? It's not like you
can't reverse-engineer qmail and make it over without using the
substandardio library -- in fact
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 14:29, David Nicol wrote:
>
> So when is someone of the "qmail is unacceptable because DJB's
> in-practice license grant does not meet strict qualifications" camp
> going to write an equivalent drop-in replacement?
I don't think a drop-in replacement makes much sense. Qma
2 matches
Mail list logo
