On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:02:25PM -0500, Barry Beckman wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2001/debian-project-200103/msg5.html
>
> Greetings Debian disciples,
>
> Please excuse this interruption as a notice that the above page is outdated.
> Most of the contents are correct alth
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wichert> I do hope you trust is to make changes sensibly. In fact the current
Wichert> reference draft already has some information on the backward and
Wichert> forward compatibility guarantees dpkg gives.
Oh,, absolutely. But
* Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020502 09:54]:
> Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I understand that dpkg can be used elsewhere than Debian, but
> > it's de facto purpose is to serve as the Debian packaging system.
>
> I'm somewhat interested in having dpkg accepted in other environments
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020502 09:54]:
> Le Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
> > I'd like to add a chapter:
> >
> > - working with the upstream maintainers
>
> Something else I wanted to add is :
> « What you always wanted to know about X »
> where X
Previously Grant Bowman wrote:
> This is somewhat an aside, but this is already moving away from
> GNU/Debian Linux specific through several ports of GNU/Debian. There
> are the hurd, bsd and win32/cygwin ports already.
I have never been able to find patches for the win32/cygwin port though.
I kn
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 02:12:54PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Surely either everything necessary should be in the dpkg reference or
> everything necessary should be in policy. I really don't want to see
> it split up into two separate documents, for that way lies madness
> again.
IMHO
Is there any reason for this thread to still be on -project? It's entirely
about rewriting debian-policy now, isn't it?
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:32:11PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > So if the dpkg reference doesn't document everything that Debian needs
> > in this respect, what is the best
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:20:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Julian> Surely either everything necessary should be in the dpkg reference or
> Julian> everything necessary should be in policy. q
> On the other hand, all packages
가브리엘향수
파운데이션
총알청바지
\25,000
\39,000
\31,500
허락 없이 메일을 보내드려 죄송합니다.
원치 않으시면 옆의 버튼을 눌러주세요.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Part I: The Debian Archive
> 1: DFSG and the sections of the archive (free, non-free, contrib, non-us)
"Components" is a much better word to use here. (And is the word used
everywhere but -policy, just ab
Le Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:24:23AM -0700, Grant Bowman écrivait:
> Sounds like a chapter on "Debian Teams", I like this concept. While you
> may get a chapter co-maintainer, it would be good to clearly assign
> responsibility for content to a representative from each team. If you
> provide an exa
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > > > I was hoping to get libpkg-guide (library packaging guide) into
> > > > Developers Reference, although the terms and language is quite
> > > > different.
> > > Agreed ... it fits well
Le Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
> Unfortunately I do not yet have any other co-maintainers --
> volunteers, anyone?
I'm volunteering. I'm going to spend some time on it but I really wish
you could propose a new structure before I start filling the gaps.
Cheers,
-
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
> > Unfortunately I do not yet have any other co-maintainers --
> > volunteers, anyone?
>
> I'm volunteering. I'm going to spend some time on it but I really wish
> you could propose a
>>""Luca" == "Luca <- De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
Luca> The dpkg reference should describe what is a dpkg package and
Luca> its internals:
As well as any new or optional input or output, and actions
not required for packaging (dpkg-deb -x details do not need
Hello,
I've got this address (http://www.lesbian.mine.nu/) sended to from
a debian mailinglist. Is this in your intention ?
Regards
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> This is rather non-sensical: all packages /are/ left to the whimsy of
> the dpkg developers. If you don't believe me, I'm sure Wichert or Adam
> will be happy to introduce some random bugs in dpkg 1.10.x to demonstrate.
Just say the word, and we'd be hap
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:20:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Julian> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 02:30:34PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >>
> >> Refer to a dpkg reference instead and document extra restrictions
>
> Julian> Su
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:13:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Luca> At last we need a document that tells maintainers how to build
> Luca> a dpkg package from source, assuming both to be Debian policy
> Luca> compliant (since we choose dpkg as our official packaging
> Luca> tool). Such a
19 matches
Mail list logo
