MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's based on something not statistically significant, is it
> unreliable?
Whether my observations are reliable enough for you to value the
point that I try to explain by samples that are valid to me, well,
that is not in my hands.
[paddy is behind everyth
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of private data, you have published an IRC log without
> first securing permission from all the participants. Personally, I
> detest people who do this even on channels where there is no explicit
> policy forbidding such behavior, so to point out t
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 01:35:01PM +0100, Patrick "Ballpark" Frank wrote:
> But lets have a look at http://pastebin.ca/885288 again and see how
> HennaX started the chat when he joined that channel. He asked if he
> has to reveal private data. A person answered him that he does not
Speaking of pri
Patrick Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > It appears that the politics of prejudice is something in common!
> > Men do this, women do that? Get over it.
>
> This is not prejudice at all.
>
> The word prejudice refers to prejudgment: i.e. making a decision
> before becoming aware
MJ Ray wrote:
> [...]
> > Some men have the hope that the women they meet are more open
> > minded. Some men have the hope that the women they meet are not
> > constantly trying to appear cool and superior.
> It appears that the politics of prejudice is something in common!
> Men do this, women d
Patrick Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> So it was just politics that were not made visible?
> And they have to be enforced in a violent way?
IMO the politics are clearly visible from the URLs in the topic when
HennaX joined #debian-women in http://pastebin.ca/885288
Enforcement is up to
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:46:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > On Thu January 31 2008 9:35:08 am Richard Hecker wrote:
> [#debian-women on irc.oftc.net] is to be an entry point for women
to get involved in Debian development,
Before somebody even dares to battle ma
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:46:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu January 31 2008 9:35:08 am Richard Hecker wrote:
> > This looks like confirmation that vorlon was right to
> > mistrust HennaX as a female.
> But surely that is not a requirement to be in that channel, right?
Indeed not. But
On Thu January 31 2008 9:35:08 am Richard Hecker wrote:
> This looks like confirmation that vorlon was right to
> mistrust HennaX as a female.
But surely that is not a requirement to be in that channel, right? I mean,
if vorlon and Clint were there
I am not saying I mistrust vorlon or anyo
Eeric Evans wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
[...]
On several IRC channels it is a requirement to reveal the realname.
[...]
If one does not like such rules, they are free to not join such
meetings.
..
But lets have a look at http://pastebin.ca/885288 again and see how
He
Martin Schulze wrote:
[...]
> On several IRC channels it is a requirement to reveal the realname.
[...]
> If one does not like such rules, they are free to not join such
> meetings.
First of all I want to thank you. You were not trying to feed me
with violent behaviour till the self full-filli
11 matches
Mail list logo
