Patrick Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> - according to german legislation a public communication network can
> deny acess only under certain circumstances
>
> - such circumstances are not pure dislike of person or opinion
I think this legislation is harmonised across the European Union
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We did not get a private mail from you also, Bas.
Maybe we are so confused because we addressed Luk not you?
All will be good, we are quite sure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I never received a private mail from you, I am sorry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AIUI Patrick Frank has threatened legal action against OFTC, so OFTC
> is currently refusing to serve him.
The legal threat is open, because:
- network representatives of OFTC abused positions and priviledges
in private battles against my person
connectio
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:27:51PM +0100, Patrick Frank wrote:
> What you post on this list, Luk Claes as reply to my postings is not
> constructive in any way.
Neither is any of your postings. Also, you seem to have completely
ignored what I wrote to you in private, which I see as proof that you
Patrick Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [14:05] * *** Banned autokilled: You are not welcome on this network.
> (2008-02-04 13:05:11)
AIUI Patrick Frank has threatened legal action against OFTC, so OFTC
is currently refusing to serve him. I believe that came out around
http://lists.debian.org/
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get lost, will you? Permanently please.
It was transparently visible how you handled your disagreement
with Sven Luther. We are all able to see how your destructive
handling of that conflict grew out to a huge community problem.
People who believe in the go
On Monday 04 February 2008, Patrick Frank wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you post on this list, Luk Claes as reply to my postings is not
> constructive in any way.
Neither is this. Get lost, will you? Permanently please.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
What you post on this list, Luk Claes as reply to my postings is not
constructive in any way.
The same time you are begging listmasters to ban me from this list,
with the intention to hide problems of the Debian project.
Please re-read the Debian Socia
Patrick Frank wrote:
> Before anybody even considers using public defacements like
> "paddy is a troll, lets hunt him"
> you should be aware of context.
A part of the context is that the OFTC IRC-network doesn't want you on
their network... Even if Debian has strong links with the IRC network,
you
Before anybody even considers using public defacements like
"paddy is a troll, lets hunt him"
you should be aware of context.
The context is certain Debian Developers playing the cabal game,
not only recently, but starting 3-4 years ago.
The situation that started the hunt for the paddy was my pu
[14:05] * Now talking on #debian-devel
[14:05] * Topic for #debian-devel is: [...]
[14:05] * Topic for #debian-devel set by Maulkin
[14:05] hi
[14:05] Enrico, you mention in context of debtags efforts that
colaboration with the guys from freshmeat.net is planned/desired. their
site seems pretty d
12 matches
Mail list logo