(Dropped planet@ and leader@, who are probably not intrested in this
anymore.)
On to, 2010-11-11 at 20:06 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:03:38PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [2010-11-11 16:14:37 CET]:
>
> > What one does on their own blog is th
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:03:38PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [2010-11-11 16:14:37 CET]:
> What one does on their own blog is their own thing, what one pushes
> explicitly to planet.debian is a different area.
>
> Just my thoughts,
> Rhonda
So, at the moment, there
Hi,
(I'm hert...@d.o and not b...@d.o)
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> What Can I Post On Planet?
[...]
> - Be very careful including material from external sites (ie, not your
>own blog/domain). The occasional picture from elsewhere is fine, but
>anything that can be (or i
> I have been made aware that people use Debian resources for personal
> financial gain using the planet.d.o syndication platform, by for
> instance including 'flattr' links and images in the text present on
> planet.
> Furthermore there are reports of webbugs in some feeds syndicated on
> planet
John Goerzen writes:
> So that essentially means "no inline images on blogs". Because any
> tag that appears in a feed on planet -- regardless of if it is a
> 1x1 transparent image or a 500x300 photo of something at Debconf --
> will, let's face it, reveal certain data to the non-Debian server
* Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [2010-11-11 16:14:37 CET]:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:27, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > There may be a way to collect money via Debian and not have conflicts.
> > But on the whole I would prefer for us to not experiment and avoid this
> > entirely.
>
> If there's a way, why
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Therefor I ask you, the maintainers of planet.d.o, to please draft a
> policy or set of guidelines that will prevent such abuse.
I second this request, although my request does not anticipate that they
*are* abuses :). For me,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:27:40PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> There's more source conflict: if there's a micropayment button on
> packages.debian.org, how will the money be divided between members of a
> packaging team? People who do NMUs? Should people who report
> particularly useful bugs be
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:27, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On to, 2010-11-11 at 14:01 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> -1 for flattr; it's a great way to contribute a few cents; and these
>> people are great contributors to Debian anyways, so why don't they get
>> rewarded?
>> while on that topic
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:11, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
>> while on that topic, maybe each package on package.qa.d.o should have
>> a flattr button ;-)
>
> And one for the packages.d.o guys. And one for the QA guys. And one for
> DSA. And one f
On 11/11/2010 06:01 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Furthermore there are reports of webbugs in some feeds syndicated on
planet, or things that systematically leak browsing behaviour to third
parties by including images directly from these sides.
I don't know much about this one, so no posi
On to, 2010-11-11 at 14:01 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> -1 for flattr; it's a great way to contribute a few cents; and these
> people are great contributors to Debian anyways, so why don't they get
> rewarded?
> while on that topic, maybe each package on package.qa.d.o should have
> a flatt
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> while on that topic, maybe each package on package.qa.d.o should have
> a flattr button ;-)
And one for the packages.d.o guys. And one for the QA guys. And one for
DSA. And one for the mirror people. And the ftp-team. And the buildd
and wann
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:56, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> [ Please note that this is my very personal opinion and does not
> neccesarily need to cover the opinion of any of the teams I am in. ]
>
> Dear planet folks,
>
> I have been made aware that people use Debian resources for personal
> finan
Hi!
* Martin Zobel-Helas [2010-11-11 10:56]:
>
> I have been made aware that people use Debian resources for personal
> financial gain using the planet.d.o syndication platform, by for
> instance including 'flattr' links and images in the text present on
> planet.
>
> Furthermore there are rep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
Am 11.11.2010 10:56, schrieb Martin Zobel-Helas:
[..]
> Therefor I ask you, the maintainers of planet.d.o, to please draft a
> policy or set of guidelines that will prevent such abuse. Violation of
> this policy should probably be grounds for
[ Please note that this is my very personal opinion and does not
neccesarily need to cover the opinion of any of the teams I am in. ]
Dear planet folks,
I have been made aware that people use Debian resources for personal
financial gain using the planet.d.o syndication platform, by for
instance
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 03:37:44PM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> Removals happen for repeatedly flooding planet and should be reversed
> when someone can demonstrate that the chronic problem has been fixed.
Actually, it is not yet decided whether some of the floods might be
caused by a Planet bu
> I think planet.d.o should include any debian-related blogs onto
> it (including their non-debian content, if the author wants),
> but exclude people/things that spam it with repeat posts
> or over-long material like entire press releases. I'd let
> non-English posts on, as long as they're UTF-8
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> Anyone can *ask* and I rarely tell anyone no. I've attached the basic
> template that I send to people who ask to have their blogs added to
> planet.
>
> If you have a problem with the inclusion of a particular type of
> context or
> Hi Mako,
>
> can you please define a policy whether non-personal blogs should be on
> planet.debian.org or not?
Sure. I'll write something up on wiki.debian.org. I've put a first
very quick bit up already and folks are welcome to edit or add:
http://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian
Just for co
> While we are at it, is there also a policy for *personal* blogs?
>
> It seems to me it is not just a DD blogs aggregator, we also have people
> working on debian related SoC projects and non-DD maintainers.
Yes. I talked to some SoC students and their mentors about this before
they were added.
* Stefano Zacchiroli [Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:42:36 +0200]:
> While we are at it, is there also a policy for *personal* blogs?
> It seems to me it is not just a DD blogs aggregator, we also have people
> working on debian related SoC projects and non-DD maintainers. Is there
> a clear line distinguis
"Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record, in 2005, after Ian's blog removal from planet.d.o
> there are some [1]discussion about this topic on -project. (Looks like that
> we have a pattern). :-)
> 1.http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/05/msg00013
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2006 09:42 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ dropped aba from the Cc, I think it would read the message anyhow ]
>
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:32:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
>>can you please define a policy whether non-personal blogs
[ dropped aba from the Cc, I think it would read the message anyhow ]
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:32:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> can you please define a policy whether non-personal blogs should be on
> planet.debian.org or not?
While we are at it, is there also a policy for *personal* blogs
Hi Mako,
can you please define a policy whether non-personal blogs should be on
planet.debian.org or not?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
