On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:59:13PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Debian did not respond.
>
> Since 1 July, new mirror reports open a wishlist bug against
> the mirrors package and someone handles it when we get time.
Unfortunately, this is a bad idea as it is now. We still tell mirror
maintainers to e
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feel free to make a change and announce it. I never saw an
> announcement that on July 1, the mirror submission form would
> automatically file bugs. I don't oppose to this, but I certainly
> oppose to it "just happening".
Most web site changes aren't
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.08.2259 +0200]:
> > Since 1 July, new mirror reports open a wishlist bug against
> > the mirrors package and someone handles it when we get time.
>
> I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reas
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.09.1245 +0200]:
> > I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reasons. If I
> > mail mirrors@, I am not warned that my message will be publicly
> > readable.
>
> You actually thought correspondence with a free software project w
[Martin F Krafft]
> I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reasons. If I
> mail mirrors@, I am not warned that my message will be publicly
> readable.
You actually thought correspondence with a free software project would
be non-public? I find that rather unusual.
I would say that u
At Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:39:25 +0200,
martin f krafft wrote:
Hi
> > I'm one of at least two handling mirrors bugs now. Can you tell me
> > how it's being reformed, please? I've heard nothing yet AFAICR.
> I don't think people associated you with mirrors previously, and
> it's the first time I've see
also sprach MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.08.2259 +0200]:
> Since 1 July, new mirror reports open a wishlist bug against
> the mirrors package and someone handles it when we get time.
> We'd welcome more help with http://bugs.debian.org/mirrors -
> if you're not a DD, mail me patches. Warning
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am aware of the points you raise, but that's not the issue. The
> issue is that there was an offer for both, ftp hosting as well as
> a new primary mirror, and Debian did not respond.
Since 1 July, new mirror reports open a wishlist bug against
the m
also sprach Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.20.1828 +0200]:
> > The ETH Zurich has sent you an offer for an additional primary
> > mirror on 1 June 2005.
[...]
>
> It is not only the offer to host specific machines for the
> debian-project. Also the wish issued several month before, to
martin f krafft wrote:
> The ETH Zurich has sent you an offer for an additional primary
> mirror on 1 June 2005. This offer has remained unanswered up until
> the present day (unless I've been purposely left out of the loop).
> In combination with their offer to host ftp.debian.org which also
> rem
also sprach Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.20.1448 +0200]:
> This is because the current export regulations from the USA require all
> crypto software to be notified to the authorities.
I am aware of the points you raise, but that's not the issue. The
issue is that there was an offer fo
martin f krafft wrote:
> Dear mirrors team,
>
> The ETH Zurich has sent you an offer for an additional primary
> mirror on 1 June 2005. This offer has remained unanswered up until
> the present day (unless I've been purposely left out of the loop).
> In combination with their offer to host ftp.deb
Dear mirrors team,
The ETH Zurich has sent you an offer for an additional primary
mirror on 1 June 2005. This offer has remained unanswered up until
the present day (unless I've been purposely left out of the loop).
In combination with their offer to host ftp.debian.org which also
remained unanswe
13 matches
Mail list logo
