Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> Serendipitously, under Steve's proposed GR, the following might not ever
>> have been necessary:
>>
>> Package: freedoom
>>
>> ...as we could just distribute the original proprietary WAD files by iD
>> software in main.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Serendipitously, under Steve's proposed GR, the following might not ever have
>been necessary:
>
>Package: freedoom
It would still have been useful, since the doom-wad-shareware package is
in non-free and is going to stay there no matter the outcome of the GR.
It would he
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Serendipitously, under Steve's proposed GR, the following might not ever have
> been necessary:
>
> Package: freedoom
>
> ...as we could just distribute the original proprietary WAD files by iD
> software in main.
This is wrong. Steve's GR only allo
Hmm, note to self: mutt doesn't send the Subject: header to ispell...
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:01:51AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Rather than contributing directly to the current discussion on what types
> of bitstreams we should or not not apply our definition of "Free Software"
> to, I t
4 matches
Mail list logo
