Andreas Barth writes:
> Hi,
>
> currently our policy says that main packages must only (build-)depend
> on main packages, but contrib and non-free packages could use packages
> from contrib and non-free.
>
> In practice build-dependencies from non-free are not used by the
> buildds for two reason
Hi Andreas and everybody,
I think that it would be acceptable to ask the maintainers of packages for
which auto-building is not allowed their opinion about dropping support for
them. This would solve the problem entirely, and aren't these packages rare
cornercases? I could not think of examples wh
Hi,
currently our policy says that main packages must only (build-)depend
on main packages, but contrib and non-free packages could use packages
from contrib and non-free.
In practice build-dependencies from non-free are not used by the
buildds for two reasons:
1. (mostly historical) we need to
3 matches
Mail list logo
