Re: illegal logo

2012-04-22 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:39:45PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > It's not a Debian logo. Not even close. I wouldn't go as far as "not even close" but they are a little bit different. Besides the colour change the swirl is, yes a swirl, but the tail ends in different places and the little dots are also

Re: illegal logo

2012-04-21 Thread Max Tsepkov
On 19.04.2012 19:39, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > It's not a Debian logo. Not even close. > It actually looks the same. > To avoid further confusion, maybe it'd be a good idea to change our logo > to something less silly. > I like debian logo now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

Re: illegal logo

2012-04-19 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
more ironically, AFAIK the majority of the people associate with Debian the open use logo, not the "official use" logo. Well may be because noone can really use the "official logo" FREELY even for Debian-related products. Even debian.org uses open use logo ;-) NB I actually like the 2nd "winner"

Re: illegal logo

2012-04-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* vangelis mouhtsis , 2012-04-19, 18:06: hi, someone reported in #debian that an institude uses, http://www.lightclinics.no/ debian's logo and i think thats illegal. It's not a Debian logo. Not even close. To avoid further confusion, maybe it'd be a good idea to change our logo to something l

illegal logo

2012-04-19 Thread vangelis mouhtsis
hi, someone reported in #debian that an institude uses, http://www.lightclinics.no/ debian's logo and i think thats illegal. --