On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:32:15PM +0100, Harald K. wrote:
> The hundred of mirrors containing the debian packages are clearly
> separated into those, which are located in the US, and those, which are
> not, because of the non-us tree, they are containing packages from. In
> contrast to the packag
Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2002 04:13 schrieb Peter Palfrader:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2002, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:32:15PM +0100, Harald K. wrote:
> > > In contrast to the package servers, the debian cd image mirrors are
> > > not separated according to this circumstances. Also t
On Tue, 05 Nov 2002, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:32:15PM +0100, Harald K. wrote:
> > In contrast to the package servers, the debian cd image mirrors are
> > not separated according to this circumstances. Also the ones located
> > in the US are containing the non-us variant of th
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:32:15PM +0100, Harald K. wrote:
> In contrast to the package servers, the debian cd image mirrors are
> not separated according to this circumstances. Also the ones located
> in the US are containing the non-us variant of the first iso
> image. I dont understand why the U
Hi
for several weeks now I am dealing with the different methods of downloading
the official cd images of the debian distribution. The hundred of mirrors
containing the debian packages are clearly separated into those, which are
located in the US, and those, which are not, because of the non-u
5 matches
Mail list logo
