Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-07-08 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: What it means to be Debian"): > [...] However, one of the things I value about our community is > that our values ar expressed in terms of our actions, not our > believes. I also value in Debian _both_ that so many of the people in Debian seem to bel

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-07-07 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Bas" == Bas Wijnen writes: Bas> The above has nothing to do with beliefs. Beliefs are about Bas> people who believe that using non-free services is better for Bas> some ethical reason. They will say that even if a free Bas> alternative would be available, the non-free ser

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:59:51PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > > The above has nothing to do with beliefs. Beliefs are about people who > > > believe > > > that using non-free services is better for some ethical reason. > > Do such people exist or that's a straw man? > I'm not sure if they do.

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-18 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:41:57PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > >I find it difficult to express my disagreement with the your views, > >and your attitude, with the respect that is due to a fellow > >contributor. But I will try. > > I looked, but somehow failed to see how the peer in qu

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:47:09PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > The above has nothing to do with beliefs. Beliefs are about people who > > believe > > that using non-free services is better for some ethical reason. > Do such pe

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-17 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >I find it difficult to express my disagreement with the your views, >and your attitude, with the respect that is due to a fellow >contributor. But I will try. I looked, but somehow failed to see how the peer in question is a contributor. All there is is a demand for *our* contribution in *

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-17 Thread Philip Hands
Ian Jackson writes: > Dominik George writes ("Re: What it means to be Debian"): >> I strongly support that. I also do *not* think that everyone who uses >> non-free services or the like should leave Debian or is neitrely bad for >> the community. >> >&g

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > The above has nothing to do with beliefs. Beliefs are about people who > believe > that using non-free services is better for some ethical reason. Do such people exist or that's a straw man? > So I agree with the illness statement (al

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:03:08PM +, Sam Hartman wrote: > no where in the social contract do we commit to using only free > tools for our work. > [...] > I choose to do none of those things, but will vigorously defend others' > right to do so. There seems to be a misunderstanding here. AFAIC

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Zlatan" == Zlatan Todoric writes: Zlatan> On the other hand - I do believe that Debian contributors Zlatan> should uphold Social Contract and DFSG as much as possible Zlatan> because if we don't push it forward and believe in it, then Zlatan> no one else will. I agree with

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:45:15PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote: > > Debian isn't advertised as a distribution whose main goal is to > > provide 100% free something while not providing anything non-free, > > I think there are other projects with such advertising. So I think > > that such strong meta

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Mostly, I *personally* do not find those people authentic enough to > > > uphold any such community standard. It's somewhat like donating to a > > > species conservation organisation, taking the money from a purse made of > > > cr

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Zlatan Todoric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/16/2015 03:27 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Debian isn't advertised as a distribution whose main goal is to > provide 100% free something while not providing anything non-free, > I think there are other projects with such advertising. So I

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Dominik George writes ("Re: What it means to be Debian"): > I strongly support that. I also do *not* think that everyone who uses > non-free services or the like should leave Debian or is neitrely bad for > the community. > > Mostly, I *personally* do not find those p

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 18:27 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 02:46:45PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > Mostly, I *personally* do not find those people authentic enough to > > uphold any such community standard. It's somewhat like donating to a > > species conservation or

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 02:46:45PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Mostly, I *personally* do not find those people authentic enough to > uphold any such community standard. It's somewhat like donating to a > species conservation organisation, taking the money from a purse made of > crocodile skin. I

What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Dominik" == Dominik George writes: Dominik> b) BELIEF = Dominik> If any Debian contributor BELIEVES that the use of Google, Dominik> and the like, is a good thing, then the illness lies in the Dominik> divergence between their contribution and their values, and

Re: What it means to be Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > This issue is important enough to me that I'd like to take a moment to > share mine. I'm not trying to pursuade you. I really appreciate how you > presented your position; you didn't try to say I was wrong, and you were > honest and open even when there is disagreement. > I am not judging y