Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 23:10:49, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> I wonder if this is the result of corporate pressure, or if this is
> somehow encouraged by the de-facto list policy.
Corporate policy. I'm asked not to use corporate e-mail address for open-
source stuff. I do not kwow why there's such
On Sonntag, 15. Mai 2011, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I was just curious about proper etiquette. I'm still a bit worried
> that corporatelessness is implicitly requested by the community.
I dont think corporatelessness in email addresses is requested by anyone.
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUB
* MJ Ray:
> At least as I understand it (IANAL), English business emails should
> contain a signature with extended contact information (thanks to the
> Business Names Act, Companies Act, Distance Selling Regs and some
> other stuff that covers the gaps).
That stems from a European directive on b
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This is mostly an etiquette question, and I'm not sure if this is the
> right mailing list to post to.
It is an interesting topic.
As a freelance consultant, my personal mail domain is the only
domain that is going to stay. I have
* Craig Small:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I wonder if this is the result of corporate pressure, or if this is
>> somehow encouraged by the de-facto list policy.
> You'll never find me using a corporate address. The IP and surveilence
> rules are just plai
On 11/05/11 22:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
This is mostly an etiquette question, and I'm not sure if this is the
right mailing list to post to.
I've noticed that compared to, say, ten years ago, relatively few
mailing list posters use corporate accounts (or accounts readily
attributable to some la
Florian Weimer
> I've noticed that compared to, say, ten years ago, relatively few
> mailing list posters use corporate accounts (or accounts readily
> attributable to some larger organization). This phenomenon is not
> restricted to Debian mailing lists. If the sender's mailbox looks
> corporat
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I wonder if this is the result of corporate pressure, or if this is
> somehow encouraged by the de-facto list policy.
You'll never find me using a corporate address. The IP and surveilence
rules are just plain crazy these days and I'
Florian Weimer writes:
> This is mostly an etiquette question, and I'm not sure if this is the
> right mailing list to post to.
> I've noticed that compared to, say, ten years ago, relatively few
> mailing list posters use corporate accounts (or accounts readily
> attributable to some larger org
This is mostly an etiquette question, and I'm not sure if this is the
right mailing list to post to.
I've noticed that compared to, say, ten years ago, relatively few
mailing list posters use corporate accounts (or accounts readily
attributable to some larger organization). This phenomenon is not
10 matches
Mail list logo
