Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
>
> > Too few MUAs have a button for "don't bother me about new mail
> > in this (sub-)thread".
>
> I wish all off-topic mails were marked with "OT" tag in the subject,
> dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged with "VAC") to a
> d
On Jo, 10 iun 10, 15:31:42, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Absolutely. Nobody is trying to censor these conversations, let's just
> have them somewere more appropriate.
...see my sig?
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/li
On 10.06.2010 16:16, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of "cabalization".
Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads.
I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether or not America,
Hy
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:16:10PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of "cabalization".
>> Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads.
>
>I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of "cabalization".
> Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads.
I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether or not America,
Hy-Brazil, Eurasia, and Scandinavia are co
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:46:13PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a
> important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are
> send to d-d-a (which is the only re
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Personally I like also that "debian-private" carries strong personal
> opinion (instead of public mailing list).
I don't think I'm able to interpret the above properly. If that is to
mean that on -private you don't need to be
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
> > Too few MUAs have a button for "don't bother me about new mail
> > in this (sub-)thread".
>
> I wish all off-topic mails were marked with "OT" tag in the subject,
> dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged wi
[Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
> Too few MUAs have a button for "don't bother me about new mail
> in this (sub-)thread".
I wish all off-topic mails were marked with "OT" tag in the subject,
dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged with "VAC") to a
different mailbox for me.
How about at l
Re: Enrico Zini 2010-06-09 <20100609140853.ga3...@enricozini.org>
> So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
> DD chatter. The fact that that idea is being very vocally pushed by no
> less than two people prompts me to double check some fundamental facts
> about the De
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:46:13PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a
important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are send
to d-d-a (which is the only require
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a
> important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are
> send to d-d-a (which is the only required list for DD).
Why would we not be better served if the p
On 09.06.2010 16:08, Enrico Zini wrote:
Hello,
there is a discussion in debian-private about the role of
debian-private. There is nothing private in that discussion, so I'm
following it up here.
So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
DD chatter. The fact
Hello,
there is a discussion in debian-private about the role of
debian-private. There is nothing private in that discussion, so I'm
following it up here.
So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
DD chatter. The fact that that idea is being very vocally pushed
14 matches
Mail list logo
