On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 12:14:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 12:37:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Continuing my quest to see how many times I can reply to myself...
> > You may or may not have seen or remember me talking a while ago about a
>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:04:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Goswin Brederlow) wrote ...
> > Could you interact with the popularity-contest package to consider the
> Where _is_ the info this package gathers?
http://www.debian.org/~apenwarr/popcon/
A search for `debian pop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Goswin Brederlow) wrote on 19.12.99 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Could you interact with the popularity-contest package to consider the
Where _is_ the info this package gathers?
MfG Kai
Could you interact with the popularity-contest package to consider the
useage of a apckage for its stableness.
The reason is that if nobody updates to a new version, then no bugs
will be filled, even if its completly broken.
May the Source be withz you.
Goswin
On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 12:37:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> You may or may not have seen or remember me talking a while ago about a
> `testing' distribution. I wanted it to fit somewhere between `stable'
> and `unstable', and be automatically populated from package
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> You may or may not have seen or remember me talking a while ago about a
> `testing' distribution. I wanted it to fit somewhere between `stable'
> and `unstable', and be automatically populated from packages uploaded
>
Hello world,
You may or may not have seen or remember me talking a while ago about a
`testing' distribution. I wanted it to fit somewhere between `stable'
and `unstable', and be automatically populated from packages uploaded
to unstable; but taking open bugs, dependencies and wha
7 matches
Mail list logo
