Re: Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN

2014-07-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN"): > (2) it has been recommended by third party organizations that we join > OIN. Please name names. The weight we should attach to such a recommendation, and indeed, our reaction more generally, wi

Re: Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN

2014-07-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN"): > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The tasks involved are: > > - review and summarize the past discussions on this topic (I'm quite > >

Re: Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN

2014-07-03 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The tasks involved are: > - review and summarize the past discussions on this topic (I'm quite > sure that such a summary already exists somewhere) I don't fancy picking up the general task that Lucas is suggesting (sorry), but re

Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN

2014-07-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, One of the task on my TO-DO list that I would happily delegate is to review the status of Debian wrt the Open Invention Network, to possibly change our position from "We are not interested in joining OIN" to "We want to join OIN", because: (1) OIN claims they have changed quite a lot over the