On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:43:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Like I said, they're random, but if they're audacious enough to send me
> > up to 2 MB of images (yes, I've had it happen -- had I not, I wouldn't
> > believe someone would ever do that), I don't see why they would somehow
> > show the
* John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-25 15:10]:
> I don't think this really makes sense. For instance, in the poll, 76%
> of the people opposed use as a general purpose address, but 92%
> supported putting it on one's personal homepage. I'm really curious
> what those people were thinking,
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Like I said, they're random, but if they're audacious enough to send me up
> to 2 MB of images (yes, I've had it happen -- had I not, I wouldn't believe
> someone would ever do that), I don't see why they would somehow show the
> courtesy of not spamming addresses used in whois
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:46:39AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > We are not talking here about people making excessive use of resources
> > > (which is already covered under the DMUP if memory serves). For
> > > instance, using a debian.org address as a contact on a domain probably
> > > genera
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:00:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:55:30AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > I further caution that it is dangerous to draw conclusions on the
> > > feelings of the project based on the unauthenticated responses of only
> > > a small minority o
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:55:30AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I further caution that it is dangerous to draw conclusions on the
> > feelings of the project based on the unauthenticated responses of only
> > a small minority of dev
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:02:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > We are not talking here about people making excessive use of resources
> > (which is already covered under the DMUP if memory serves). For
> > instance, using a debian.o
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> We are not talking here about people making excessive use of resources
> (which is already covered under the DMUP if memory serves). For
> instance, using a debian.org address as a contact on a domain probably
> generates, at most, 30
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:55:30AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > I further caution that it is dangerous to draw conclusions on the
> > feelings of the project based on the unauthenticated responses of only
> > a small minority of developers.
>
> More than 10% responded. AFAIK, that's way more
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:08:12AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> (...)
> >>I don't think this really makes sense. For instance, in the poll, 76%
> >>of the people opposed use as a general purpose address,
[posting again to the proper list. Sorry...]
Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
(...)
I don't think this really makes sense. For instance, in the poll, 76%
of the people opposed use as a general purpose address, but 92%
supported putting it on
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> I further caution that it is dangerous to draw conclusions on the
> feelings of the project based on the unauthenticated responses of only
> a small minority of developers.
More than 10% responded. AFAIK, that's way more than in any
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:34:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.01.25.2314 +0100]:
> > Thanks Michael for your hard work in putting this together; it clearly
> > took a good deal of time. I agree with Martin, adding this to the
> > developers
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:10:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 08:13:23PM +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
> Leader wrote:
> > * Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-23 10:47]:
> > > 3.) Would it suffice to document the (presumable) opinion of the
> > > proje
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 08:13:23PM +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-23 10:47]:
> > 3.) Would it suffice to document the (presumable) opinion of the
> > project in the Debian Developer's Reference as 'best practice'?
>
> Document
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-25 23:34]:
> > Thanks Michael for your hard work in putting this together; it clearly
> > took a good deal of time. I agree with Martin, adding this to the
> > developers reference sounds like a good way to start.
>
> sorry, haven't followed. are the
also sprach Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.01.25.2314 +0100]:
> Thanks Michael for your hard work in putting this together; it clearly
> took a good deal of time. I agree with Martin, adding this to the
> developers reference sounds like a good way to start.
sorry, haven't followed. are
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:47:10AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:19:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Could everbody interested please fill out that small query below and
> > send the answers to me?
>
> Thanks a lot to everybody who participated. I recieved around a h
* Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-23 10:47]:
> 3.) Would it suffice to document the (presumable) opinion of the
> project in the Debian Developer's Reference as 'best practice'?
Documenting this in the Developer's Reference is certainly a good
idea. This way, new and old developers wou
Hello again,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:19:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Could everbody interested please fill out that small query below and
> send the answers to me?
Thanks a lot to everybody who participated. I recieved around a hundred
submission, which is a significant part of the Debia
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:19:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi everybody,
Hello,
not to rain on your parade or anything, just a few suggestions. Many people
have probably already answered to this poll, so it's certainly not sensible
to change it anymore, but just in case you want to make ano
> My experience is that it's very easy to not notice that the BTS is
> infinitly deferring your BTS mails, unless you keep a very close
> eye on your outgoing mail queue and bounces folder. It could easily be
> happining to others besides me.
Have you tried it with "set envelope_from=yes" in mutt?
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Err, your description is way too overgeneralized; other people post as @d.o
> to the BTS without any problems[1]. I suggest you have -admin diagnose the
> exact problem at hand, and fix that.
I have posted specific descriptions of the problem to debian-devel and
debian-admin w
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:08:26AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Hmm, I've replied to the survey, but note that some of us cannot use our
> @debian.org email addresses for simple, 100% ok things like responding
> to bug reports, because the machine running the BTS has broken reveived
> header checks, a
Hmm, I've replied to the survey, but note that some of us cannot use our
@debian.org email addresses for simple, 100% ok things like responding
to bug reports, because the machine running the BTS has broken reveived
header checks, and rejects mails that appear to be "forged" as from
@debian.org. Th
[answering on -project, as you said public quotation was alright]
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:58:59PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I think it does not make any sense at all to talk about abuse of
> @debian.org email addresses when they are continuously and massively
> abused by spam, we have
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:58:11PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. Using @d.o for dealing with FLOSS with a loose debian-relationship
> > (e.g. reporting a bug/patch in the upstream bug tracker of an unrelated
> > package, posting on mailing lists of pr
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> 2. Using @d.o for dealing with FLOSS with a loose debian-relationship
> (e.g. reporting a bug/patch in the upstream bug tracker of an unrelated
> package, posting on mailing lists of projects without being the Debian
> maintainer etc.)
>
> Alr
Hi everybody,
There seems to be some confusion about what one should do or not do with
his @debian.org email address. Therefore, I'd like to get some input on
what people think should be right thing to do, the results could then be
used to improve/update the DMUP. I talked about this with our DPL
29 matches
Mail list logo
