On 06-Jan-00 J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\) wrote:
> I think you're referring to coverage like
> http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2000/0/ns-12411.html . It doesn't talk about an
> alliance. "SuSE joins Debian in designing version of its distribution
> specifically for the Mac" should be read as something like "
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 14:15:07 +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> They say that Debian and Suse made an alliance for porting Linux on
> PowerPC and in particular on Mac machines.
I think you're referring to coverage like
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2000/0/ns-12411.html . It doesn't talk about an
a
Hi!
In these days I'm reading more than one news (in Italy) about Suse and
Debian (defined as two of most important commercial linux distributors...
:P). They say that Debian and Suse made an alliance for porting Linux on
PowerPC and in particular on Mac machines.
Why so? :o
bye
Christian
--
3 matches
Mail list logo