On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:40:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>I was asked this morning to jump in for someone else and give
>a presentation on the state of the project at the upcoming LCA.
>I always enjoy to talk about Debian, so I accepted, but I leave
>tomorrow and so this is a bit of a short
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:10:41AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > - what are the major changes in the project and our product(s) since
> > > the etch release?
>
> > I feel the release team tools are getting improved more and mo
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: State of the project - input needed"):
> I think:
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/a_problem_with_tools/
> is a big one that deserves attention. It's been a low-level grumble for
> quite some time in various places, but it's get
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > - what are the major changes in the project and our product(s) since
> > the etch release?
> I feel the release team tools are getting improved more and more, making
> library transitions (and testing transitions in general) smoo
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - what are current unsolved challenges?
I think:
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/a_problem_with_tools/
is a big one that deserves attention. It's been a low-level grumble for
quite some time in various places, but it's getting louder. It's
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:40:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am thus hoping that you can help me a bit to compile a list of
> current topics in Debian, so quick responses are especially
> appreciated.
I would look at http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews and its past
issues.
--
Stefano Za
On 24/01/2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> - what else would you deem relevant to a "state of the project"
> summary?
It is just me or are there more and more teams, counting more and more
members? Maybe graphing their count and member count might be
interesting.
And aren't we moving to using (pub
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - what are the major changes in the project and our product(s) since
> the etch release?
I think Debian Maintainers came into the project since etch, didn't
they, or at least started being active? That's a big change and seems
to be a big incentive/m
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:40:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> - what are the major changes in the project and our product(s) since
> the etch release?
>
> - what else would you deem relevant to a "state of the project"
> summary?
Assuming you're going to be listing other incremental chan
also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.24.1135 +0100]:
> Also, the testing security team seems to be doing a great job, further
> increasing testing's usability for our users.
Which reminds me of recent additions to the security team and the
DSA team...
thanks, Michael!
--
.''`
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:40:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> - what are some pending decisions that have to be made?
Not sure about a decision, but the pending addition of GNU/KFreeBSD to
the archive sounds worthwhile to me (though I don't know the current
state, but I was under the impressi
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
- what else would you deem relevant to a "state of the project"
summary?
I'm a little bit unsure whether it is the right forum but Debian-Med
gained some momentum in the last year and we consider the Lenny release
as the release with debian-med 1.0.
Dear folks,
I was asked this morning to jump in for someone else and give
a presentation on the state of the project at the upcoming LCA.
I always enjoy to talk about Debian, so I accepted, but I leave
tomorrow and so this is a bit of a short notice.
I am thus hoping that you can help me a bit to
13 matches
Mail list logo
