Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-16 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:11:31PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:24:41PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote: > > I sent two e-mails off-list to you, but I didn't get any reply for two > > hours > > now. The update seems to be urgent, so just in case that my e-mails are > > pi

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-12 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Umm... just wondering... what DVD images are you giving away? Self-built ones. > I mean, our CDs are known to be quite broken and have been like that for > some time, I don't know about DVDs, I'd expect them to be in a little better > shape,

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-12 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040611 17:44]: > Umm... just wondering... what DVD images are you giving away? Ask Joerg Jaspert who did most of building (and swearing) the DVD image. Basically it is a tc1-based sarge for i386 and PowerPC. Yours sincerely, Alexander signatur

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Tobias Toedter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 June 2004 17:42, Michael Banck wrote: > We're in #debian.de on OFTC. Unfortunately, we're mostly done now and I > did not have time to look at your changes. I've put an updated version > of the flyer up at the original URL. I'll try to loo

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
> I've updated the Debian flyer[1] for this year's LinuxTag. As we are > going to hand out Sarge-DVDs anyway and in order to make it a bit more Umm... just wondering... what DVD images are you giving away? I mean, our CDs are known to be quite broken and have been like that for some time, I don't

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 11 June 2004 17:11, Michael Banck wrote: > > I'm terribly sorry, it seems GMX believes you're a SPAM relay. This is > > the first time I've had a problem with it. > > No

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Tobias Toedter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 June 2004 17:11, Michael Banck wrote: > I'm terribly sorry, it seems GMX believes you're a SPAM relay. This is > the first time I've had a problem with it. Now this is strange; I'm using GMX as my mail host. > > Please find the updated G

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:24:41PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote: > I sent two e-mails off-list to you, but I didn't get any reply for two hours > now. The update seems to be urgent, so just in case that my e-mails are > piped to /dev/null by your spamfilter, I try this list again. I'm terribly so

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Tobias Toedter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 June 2004 14:14, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote: > > Does the German version get printed, too? In that case, there are some > > issues with it as well. It's not updated, for one. Would

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote: > On Friday 11 June 2004 11:18, Michael Banck wrote: > > I've updated the Debian flyer[1] for this year's LinuxTag. As we are > > going to hand out Sarge-DVDs anyway and in order to make it a bit more > > current and future-proof, I've

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Tobias Toedter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Friday 11 June 2004 11:18, Michael Banck wrote: > I've updated the Debian flyer[1] for this year's LinuxTag. As we are > going to hand out Sarge-DVDs anyway and in order to make it a bit more > current and future-proof, I've based the conten

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:50:51AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > Include AMD64 into the list of supported architectures? I've not tried > it, I've just seen (mail on d-d, IIRC) that AMD64 has now build >95% of > the Debian packages, if I understood this right. As it is ve

Re: RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Friday 11 June 2004 11.18, Michael Banck wrote: [upgraded flyer] Include AMD64 into the list of supported architectures? I've not tried it, I've just seen (mail on d-d, IIRC) that AMD64 has now build >95% of the Debian packages, if I understood this right. cheers -- vbi (Oh, and is the colo

RfC: Updated Debian Flyer

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Banck
Hello, I've updated the Debian flyer[1] for this year's LinuxTag. As we are going to hand out Sarge-DVDs anyway and in order to make it a bit more current and future-proof, I've based the content on Sarge now. We have to submit the .pdf for printing today, so I'd appreciate any comments pertaining