Re: snapshot.d.n (was: Complaint about #debian operator)

2006-12-20 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Andrew Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 16:20]: > On 12/14/05, Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >actually, NetApp (the storage company) and Intel (the chip > >manufacture) are solving this problem for us. we get a 7 or > >10Tbyte storage from NetApp and two beefy servers to us

Re: snapshot.d.n (was: Complaint about #debian operator)

2006-12-20 Thread Andrew Saunders
On 12/14/05, Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: actually, NetApp (the storage company) and Intel (the chip manufacture) are solving this problem for us. we get a 7 or 10Tbyte storage from NetApp and two beefy servers to use as a front end for both CD/DVD generation and serving of CDs/DV

Re: snapshot.d.n (was: Complaint about #debian operator)

2005-12-15 Thread Mirosław Baran
[Andreas Schuldei pisze na temat "Re: snapshot.d.n (was: Complaint about #debian operator)"]: > actually, NetApp (the storage company) and Intel (the chip > manufacture) are solving this problem for us. we get a 7 or > 10Tbyte storage from NetApp and two beefy servers to use a

Re: snapshot.d.n (was: Complaint about #debian operator)

2005-12-14 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-14 12:10:30]: > also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.12.14.1142 +0100]: > > I believe this is due to snapshot.d.n having lost a considerable > > amount of its archive. As those patches were generated from the > > packages > > ... this