On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 11:36:30AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 07:37:55AM -0700, Robert Jones wrote:
> > Quoth Anthony Towns on 25 Oct, 1999:
>
>
> All this `I've got a proposal, let's vote on it' stuff isn't quite right.
> We didn't vote on debconf, we discussed it, the
Quoth Anthony Towns on 26 Oct, 1999:
> > Quoth Anthony Towns on 25 Oct, 1999:
> (Saith?)
Hrm. Perhaps.
> Without a prototype, we shouldn't be voting. Throwing out ideas,
> is fine, we've alreay done a lot of that, even before Lalo said
> anything. Personally, I was finally getting around to try
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 11:27:06AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 05:29:46PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
>
> [package-pool/hardlinks/mirror bandwidth efficiency]
> > Jason informs me this is already done by rsync, and we're
> > moving our mirrors to rsync, so, this is already
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 07:37:55AM -0700, Robert Jones wrote:
> Quoth Anthony Towns on 25 Oct, 1999:
(Saith?)
> [ Disclaimer: I am not a Debian developer yet, due to the new-maintainer
*sigh*
> > First, proposals without code are pointless. They're fun and all to
> > discuss and such, but they
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 05:29:46PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
[package-pool/hardlinks/mirror bandwidth efficiency]
> Jason informs me this is already done by rsync, and we're
> moving our mirrors to rsync, so, this is already solved
> regardless of whether we want to use the Incremental process or
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 04:06:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 03:18:47AM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> > Also, could you people please stop for a moment and really evaluate
> > the ammount of code needed? Get real: this is _trivial_.
>
> We'd need code to:
>
> * ma
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 01:30:44PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > Thus if the project (or the project leader) wants things to be
> > done with the archive, the ftpmasters have to get it implemented
> > (with or without help from others) or they will have to
Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
> Then why? Does a proper bug report exist? Is it just slowly processing
> bug report? Or is it something else?
There is indeed a bugreport, and it's old. Months at least. Last I heard
the only reason was that it was a lot of work...
Wichert.
--
__
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The ftpmasters do their work for the project. They exist
> > on behalf of the project. The project does not exist as result
> > of the ftpmasters, it's vice versa.
>
> True. However that doesn't always seem to work that way. A good example
> is that we have a consensu
Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
> Apparently I wasn't clear enough.
I had already posted by then...
> The ftpmasters do their work for the project. They exist
> on behalf of the project. The project does not exist as result
> of the ftpmasters, it's vice versa.
True. However that doesn't alwa
Quoth Anthony Towns on 25 Oct, 1999:
[ Disclaimer: I am not a Debian developer yet, due to the new-maintainer
freeze. I have been following the project for a while, however. Please
forgive if this is out of order. ]
> First, proposals without code are pointless. They're fun and all to
> d
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 03:18:47AM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> Also, could you people please stop for a moment and really evaluate
> the ammount of code needed? Get real: this is _trivial_.
We'd need code to:
* make life easy for the mirrors (either a working package pool,
or t
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 08:32:07PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> That said, this proposal has no meaning without an actual implementation
> of 'Package Pools', and none exists yet. However I know of at least 2
> efforts to make one, so maybe it should be shelved until one gets
> finished? [It
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 12:29:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 07:34:26PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> > I'm formally proposing the release process that we have been
> > discussing for over a year, known as ``package pool'', for
> > discussion and voting. The discussion wi
[Lame cross post to -announce removed, gah]
> The ftpmasters do their work for the project. They exist
> on behalf of the project. The project does not exist as result
> of the ftpmasters, it's vice versa.
However, the FTP masters are the resident experts in field of 'ftp archive
mainti', igno
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 07:34:26PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> I'm formally proposing the release process that we have been
> discussing for over a year, known as ``package pool'', for
> discussion and voting. The discussion will take place on
> debian-project. Anyone interested should follow this
16 matches
Mail list logo
