Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Bernd Zeimetz writes:
>>
>>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> and it has numerous RC bugs.
Lets see:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs-tools.html
RC bugs: 1
>>> There were 6 bugs when I looked at the page before
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz writes:
>
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
and it has numerous RC bugs.
>>> Lets see:
>>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs-tools.html
>>>
>>> RC bugs: 1
>> There were 6 bugs when I looked at the page before writing my mail, guess
>> you've
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> and it has numerous RC bugs.
>>
>> Lets see:
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs-tools.html
>>
>> RC bugs: 1
>
> There were 6 bugs when I looked at the page before writing my mail, guess
> you've
> merged/downgraded/... the other
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> and it has numerous RC bugs.
>
> Lets see:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs-tools.html
>
> RC bugs: 1
There were 6 bugs when I looked at the page before writing my mail, guess you've
merged/downgraded/... the others.I should have added another one - brea
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:20:08PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The upgrade path to multiarch is for the multiarch i386 deb to
>> Conflicts/Replaces: . Which
>> means ia32-libs or ia32-libs-gtk for the old system or ia32-
>> for the ia32-apt-get one.
>
> If this
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:20:08PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The upgrade path to multiarch is for the multiarch i386 deb to
> Conflicts/Replaces: . Which
> means ia32-libs or ia32-libs-gtk for the old system or ia32-
> for the ia32-apt-get one.
If this means ia32-apt-get is installing f
Pierre Habouzit writes:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:30:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Yannick writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >
>> >> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools
>> >> is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:30:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Yannick writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> >> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools
> >> is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead of arguing.
> >
> > Alas, despite
Yannick writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools
>> is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead of arguing.
>
> Alas, despite the diversion of the package management tools, I find ia32-
> apt-get pretty useful.
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools
> is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead of arguing.
Alas, despite the diversion of the package management tools, I find ia32-
apt-get pretty useful.
For instance, I wanted to t
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le vendredi 03 juillet 2009 Ã 14:59 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a
> écrit :
>> > Do you *really* want to have more reasons?
>>
>> I would settle for one good one. :)
>
> OK, letâs try one that you can understand. Try picturing a bridge.
> ia32-libs-tools is trying
Le vendredi 03 juillet 2009 à 14:59 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a
écrit :
> > Do you *really* want to have more reasons?
>
> I would settle for one good one. :)
OK, let’s try one that you can understand. Try picturing a bridge.
ia32-libs-tools is trying to cross the bridge, but there is Ganneff
s
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Please do files bugs about issues you consider blockers for
>> ia32-libs-tools and squeeze and please include if that applies even if
>> there is the old ia32-libs in parallel to it (i.e. when it doesn't get
>> pulled in on upgrades).
>
> T
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Last I heart s390 planed to drop 31bit support and go fully 64bit.
>
> This was the plan. However I don't know if it is the best solution. The
> fact is: only Debian and SuSE still supports a complete
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Last I heart s390 planed to drop 31bit support and go fully 64bit.
This was the plan. However I don't know if it is the best solution. The
fact is: only Debian and SuSE still supports a complete 31bit userland.
RHEL is release
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Please do files bugs about issues you consider blockers for
> ia32-libs-tools and squeeze and please include if that applies even if
> there is the old ia32-libs in parallel to it (i.e. when it doesn't get
> pulled in on upgrades).
The package is a mess, the idea is
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:18:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> There is only one thing that DAK might want to adapt to. For most
>> multiarch architectures there is a definite main architecture that
>> most things should be in and then some corner cases where di
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:18:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> There is only one thing that DAK might want to adapt to. For most
> multiarch architectures there is a definite main architecture that
> most things should be in and then some corner cases where different
> architetcure might b
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> Hello world,
>
> (Please remember that we can only speak for ourselves and not the
> security/release/any other teams, individuals or other sentient beings.)
>
> During the recent discussion about about ia32-libs{,-gtk,-tools} there were
> various requests for removal / co
19 matches
Mail list logo
