[I am *so* not subscribed. Cc me if you particularly want me to read
what you have to say. Do not expect a reply.]
> There are 5 people listed in the -legal top 10 who are not DDs now
> and of those: Andrew Suffield stopped posting when he was still a DD
> IIRC
Basically when I quit. I spent abou
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
I've posted to -legal about the confusing nature of the above
description, the jump to "activists" and how to make the analysis more
illuminating.
I think Andreas meant "active people" rather than what you seem to be
interpreting "activists" to be.
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:02 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> I've posted to -legal about the confusing nature of the above
> description, the jump to "activists" and how to make the analysis more
> illuminating.
I think Andreas meant "active people" rather than what you seem to be
interpreting "activists"
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats/authorstat_jr.pdf
http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats/authorstat_med.pdf
Here the difference is very clear and the conclusion that Debian
Junior needs definitely help. Other list show similar decreasi
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > You conflate low mailing list activity with “activity problems”. At
>
> s/low/decreasing/
>
> > least, that's the best way I can understand your motivation in posting
> > these reports.
>
> In principle, yes.
That's the pre
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
In another post, Andreas called it "a quick and dirty helper for a
talks of mine at DebConf and I never thought that it became that
popular". It isn't that popular,
... popular amongst DebConf attendees.
but spamming N debian lists with the
graphs does ten
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
You conflate low mailing list activity with “activity problems”. At
s/low/decreasing/
least, that's the best way I can understand your motivation in posting
these reports.
In principle, yes.
If you have a better explanation of what you mean by “acti
On 2009-01-17, Andreas Tille wrote:
> kde
> ---
> Ups - is this project dying or has the list activity just moved
> to an different mailing list???
The project is going fine. You are looking at the "user list", but KDE
is so easy to use for everyone that user support mostly isn't
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Right - the statistics themselves are interesting, but the
> > assumption that more list posting is better is an unhealthy one.
>
> Could you please quote where I said this.
You conflate low mailing list activity with “ac
Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> At least debian-qa is "maintainer" of an increasing amount of packages
> and I always wonder who is a reliable coworker (is available and avtive
> over a long time period). This conclusion can not be drawn out of the
> currently avaibale list statistics on lists.debian
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:25:38PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > For instance, I was gratified to see the statistics for debian-legal,
> > because they support my position that the discussion there is being DoSed by
> > non-DDs who are trying to use it as a forum to persuade Deb
Andreas Tille wrote:
>> And in the comments on debian-qa, Andreas, you conclude that QA is important
>> and it would be good to see a wider base - but the debian-qa list is only a
>> very small segment of the overall QA activity in Debian, most of which
>> doesn't need centralized coordination...
Steve Langasek wrote:
> For instance, I was gratified to see the statistics for debian-legal,
> because they support my position that the discussion there is being DoSed by
> non-DDs who are trying to use it as a forum to persuade Debian that their
> interpretation of the DFSG is the correct one.
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
Right - the statistics themselves are interesting, but the assumption that
more list posting is better is an unhealthy one.
Could you please quote where I said this. Perhaps I described
some things to simple - but I hope I did not this kind of
oversi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:12:47PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:59:23PM +, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > www
> > ---
> > While Josip Rodin was very active on this list he failed
> > in finding a new activist after he became quiet since 2003.
> > Frank Lichte
Andreas Tille wrote:
> openoffice
> ---
> Rene, please try to form a real team around Openoffice!!!
No comment except my reply on -openoffice directly. Get your facts
straight, please.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:59:23PM +, Andreas Tille wrote:
> www
> ---
> While Josip Rodin was very active on this list he failed
> in finding a new activist after he became quiet since 2003.
> Frank Lichtenheld and Matt Kraai tried to fullfill this role
> but it seems we need m
Andreas Tille wrote:
> legal
> ---
> The quite often observed wave-shaped pattern and only a view
> activists left to discuss legal problems.
I've posted to -legal about the confusing nature of the above
description, the jump to "activists" and how to make the analysis more
illumi
18 matches
Mail list logo
