Re: Status of mirror split and AMD64

2006-01-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Anthony Towns wrote: > Joey Hess wrote: > > So is there something else that needs to be done, on ftp-master or the > > like? > > Yes; one of the specific requirements is that ftp.d.o will /not/ be a > full mirror, in order to make it trivially easy for people to mirror > Debian usefully without fi

Re: Status of mirror split and AMD64

2006-01-06 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:55:12AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > There have also been ongoing discussions about optimizing > apt-ftparchive, but I am not sure whether this is part of the solution > as well. Maybe aj can comment on that. apt-ftparchive is causing a bit too much load for any signif

Re: Status of mirror split and AMD64

2006-01-06 Thread Joey Hess
Michael Banck wrote: > Q_: there's already a reasonably easy script, it's more the > issue of making it easy for people to find a (eg) m68k mirror > when the country mirror only had i386 eg Back before sarge was released I added information about what arches each mirror carries to Mir

Re: Status of mirror split and AMD64

2006-01-06 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Friday, 06 Jan 2006, you wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > could the FTP-Team please clairify what the current status of the mirror > > split and the inclusion of AMD64 is? It has been said this will happen > > directly after the release of sar

Re: Status of mirror split and AMD64

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > could the FTP-Team please clairify what the current status of the mirror > split and the inclusion of AMD64 is? It has been said this will happen > directly after the release of sarge. Sarge is now 7 month out and (to > the endus