Thorsten Glaser writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> It has recently been “discovered” (i.e. the implications finally
> arrived in peoples’ heads) that the AGPL prevents making available
> embargoed security hotfixes (because you can’t deploy them because
Ian Jackson chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> (The main program I'm thinking of here is a Ruby on Rails
> application.) What are people's feelings about AGPLv3 ?
Completely beyond licencing (I’m firm on the BSD side of things ofc):
It has recently been “discovered” (i.e. the implications f
* Paul Tagliamonte , 2013-12-15, 10:02:
As an additional permission, you may use, redistribute and/or modify
this work under any DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines) free
license, as interpreted by the Debian FTP Team, or the Debian Project
by means of General Resolution. Examples of DFSG fre
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:57:59AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I'd very very much prefer to do something like this for my Debian work,
> even so far as to say that it can be used under the terms of any DFSG
> free license - but I'm also perfectly cool to use {,A,L}GPL-{2,3}+ for my
> work as w
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:32:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Nevertheless your opinion is interesting to me [...]
> >
> > [explanations]
>
> Thanks for that.
If you find clarification of the license that are grounded in the actual
text and written by B. Kuhn or the FSF, please forward them
Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:45:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Perhaps I haven't looked in the right places but either I don't see
> > the same concerns as you do, or I haven't
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:45:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> > I am fine with the stated purpose of the AGPLv3, however I do not think the
> > actual implementation is compatible with free softwar
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:35:05PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Of course that only applies to future versions of the GNU GPL. It's
> not possible to switch from AGPL to GPL (or the other way) with that
> wording.
Indeed, just a datapoint for what other projects do. I'd be fine to
include in my De
Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> I am fine with the stated purpose of the AGPLv3, however I do not think the
> actual implementation is compatible with free software.
>
> There have been no official clarification how the AGPLv3 is s
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
>> wrote:
>> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suita
Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> >> [AGPLv3] is the least-free license currently
Paul Tagliamonte writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
> > modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public Licens
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
> for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and
> if they aren't, then we can probably write a licence exception).
> (The main program I'm
Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
> > for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-com
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On 12/12/2013 06:44 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * It would clearly be sensible to appoint a licence steward in the
> >GPLv3 sense. If the current project leadership lack free software
> >
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (This is a bit off-topic for the Debian list; I hope people won't mind
> me asking opinions here though.)
>
> I'm being asked for advice on encouraging contributions by the people
> behind a couple of "community-ish" websites which I u
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> * It would clearly be sensible to appoint a licence steward in the
> GPLv3 sense. If the current project leadership lack free software
> credibility, could SPI serve as licence steward ?
On this I can not comment.
> What instructions/d
On 12/12/2013 06:44 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
(This is a bit off-topic for the Debian list; I hope people won't mind
me asking opinions here though.)
I'm being asked for advice on encouraging contributions by the people
behind a couple of "community-ish" websites which I use regularly.
There's a
18 matches
Mail list logo
