martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.19.1751 +0100]:
> > > I am not in the position to complain at this stage in the game,
> > > but I think it would have been nice for you to quickly announce
> > > the location of continuation of this discussion here...
>
Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 05:50:18PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > I am not in the position to complain at this stage in the game, but
> > I think it would have been nice for you to quickly announce the
> > location of continuation of this discussion here...
>
> It's the A
also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.19.1751 +0100]:
> > I am not in the position to complain at this stage in the game,
> > but I think it would have been nice for you to quickly announce
> > the location of continuation of this discussion here...
>
> It's the APT development li
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 05:50:18PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am not in the position to complain at this stage in the game, but
> I think it would have been nice for you to quickly announce the
> location of continuation of this discussion here...
It's the APT development list, so it's what
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.19.1733 +0100]:
> There's already a discussion on the deity mailing list.
I am not in the position to complain at this stage in the game, but
I think it would have been nice for you to quickly announce the
location of continuation of this dis
* martin f. krafft:
> Florian: what's the status? Can we get started?
There's already a discussion on the deity mailing list. At this
stage, we have to identify potential showstoppers, then we can decide
on which things we should work first.
It's certainly necessary to check if APT frontends st
6 matches
Mail list logo
