On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I think it has been suggested earlier in related discussions that a
> cleanup of long time inactive DD's may make a rather significant dent in
> the number of 1024 bits keys. Is this something you're considering?
That would be something fo
On Sun, April 20, 2014 06:12, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx dijo [Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:51:45AM +0200]:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:41:40PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
>> > Upon request. Made with an unpackaged set of keyrings[0].
>>
>> Thanks for the update.
>> (...)
>> So we seem to making
Kurt Roeckx dijo [Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:51:45AM +0200]:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:41:40PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Upon request. Made with an unpackaged set of keyrings[0].
>
> Thanks for the update.
> (...)
> So we seem to making some progress, and I hope the rest will
> follow soon.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:41:40PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> Upon request. Made with an unpackaged set of keyrings[0].
Thanks for the update.
So we had in january:
DDs:
623 "DSA"
624 1024
DMs:
54 "DSA"
54 1024
non-upload:
0 "DSA"
0 1024
In february:
DDs:
611
4 matches
Mail list logo
