On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:38:54PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> OK, so we have a few keys here.
> Tom
> New Per
> Old Per
> Old Per is in the Debian keyring
> New Per signed Tom's key
> The problem. Is New Per really Old Per?
Per wrote to me. He says he's waiting since many time for the incl
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 09:36:41PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> I'm processing my first NM and I'm in identification process. He is Tom
> Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. He has a gpg key signed by Per
> Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but Per signed Tom's key with his new gpg
> key, and this k
I continue with that problem. Tom's key is signed by a new key of Per
Lundberg as I can see:
bash-2.03$ gpg --check-sigs tomcato
pub 1024D/A5E43EA3 1999-12-18 Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! A5E43EA3 1999-12-18 Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! BDFAA963 2000-08-23
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
> I think it would then depend on whether you can obtain a
> trust path from that GPG key to Mr. Lundberg himself. If
> it for example is signed by his old key which is in the
> keyring or if it is signed by another developer, you can
Howdy,
I found in db.debian.org...
ub 1024D/89B2B733 2000-06-19 Per Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 67FE A7C9 C8A9 9BDF B8DF 6224 973C 47BE 89B2 B733
sig89B2B733 2000-06-19 Per Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig90CB3189 2000-06-19 Per Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 09:36:41PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm processing my first NM and I'm in identification process. He is Tom
> Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. He has a gpg key signed by Per
> Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but Per signed Tom's key with his new gpg
> key, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
