* Sam Hartman: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another
Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25 May 2019 18:37:11 -0400):
> >>>>> "Mathias" == Mathias Behrle writes:
>
> Mathias> * Karsten Merker: " Re: Question f
> "Norbert" == Norbert Preining writes:
Norbert> Hi Sam, surprising statements from you ...
Norbert> On Wed, 22 May 2019, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> The same is true of package maintainership though. We sometimes
>> do change the maintainership because we're unhappy with how
> "Mathias" == Mathias Behrle writes:
Mathias> * Karsten Merker: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What
Mathias> Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25
Mathias> May 2019 17:49:13 +0200):
Mathias> Hi together,
Mathias> I am supporting wholeheartedly th
Hi Sam,
surprising statements from you ...
On Wed, 22 May 2019, Sam Hartman wrote:
> The same is true of package maintainership though. We sometimes do
> change the maintainership because we're unhappy with how someone
> maintains their packages. That rarely uses the formal policy that goes
??
On May 25, 2019 9:16:09 PM UTC, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
>> b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of
>>somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet
>>admin to be justified would be if the furth
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of
>somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet
>admin to be justified would be if the further inclusion of the
>feed on planet would constitute a cr
* Karsten Merker: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another
Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25 May 2019 17:49:13 +0200):
Hi together,
I am supporting wholeheartedly the view of Carsten with some small amendments.
> a) As the general rule DDs who are not p
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 18:27 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> If you make a bad upload, someone will be quick to point out to you
> exactly which part of debian policy you've messed up and file an RC bug
> against your package. Our community guidelines deserve to be on the same
> standard, if a blog
Hi Phil,
Le Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Philip Hands a écrit :
>
> I see no reason to assume the worst.
Maybe growth and the law of big numbers ? The more we are the more it
is likely to happen.
As somebody who had my work reverted temporarly by somebody who acted
alone (although mo
> "Norbert" == Norbert Preining writes:
Norbert> On Tue, 21 May 2019, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I think it's more open and equally clean for someone who's blog
>> has been non- consensually removed to be able to put it back
>> themselves immediately (if they think the removal
> "Benj" == Benj Mako Hill writes:
Benj> I'd be happy to document this on the Planet wiki page.
I agree with Joerg that I don't think we need a lot of new rules here.
I'll point out that the situation I asked about has never happened
(although one close to it in some ways did), and it f
Scott Kitterman writes:
...
> I think defaulting to silencing people is the opposite of openness.
It does not strike me as defaulting to silencing people, to allow the
people we all effectively trust with root on all of our systems (DDs) to
exercise their judgement, and very occasionally apply it
On Tue, 21 May 2019, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think it's more open and equally clean for someone who's blog has been non-
> consensually removed to be able to put it back themselves immediately (if
> they
> think the removal was unreasonable) and point the remover at the Planet
> Debian
> adm
On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:41:51 PM EDT Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm a planet admin although, as you suggest, I think this is outside
> of the area of documented policy.
>
>
>
> > Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have
> > removed my blog from planet.
Greetings!
I'm a planet admin although, as you suggest, I think this is outside
of the area of documented policy.
> Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have
> removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are saying enough
> to believe it is not vandalism; they h
On 15409 March 1977, Sam Hartman wrote:
Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have
removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are saying enough
to believe it is not vandalism; they honestly believe I did something
wrong. I can't understand from their message ho
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Carter writes:
>> 2) Ask the planet admins to respond to the situation and either
>> help me understand the problem or add my blog back.
Jonathan> Option number two seems like the entirely logical and
Jonathan> reasonable approach. If it seems that yo
Hi Sam
On 2019/05/21 12:15, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Obviously this question is motivated by things that happened last year,
> but I'm not asking about that situation, and the details of the question
> I'm asking are intentionally different in ways that matter at least to
> me.
It's kind of hard to i
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Question for Planet Admins: What Should I
Ian> do if another Developer Removes my Blog"):
>> Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they
>> have removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are
Sam Hartman writes ("Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another
Developer Removes my Blog"):
> Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have
> removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are saying enough
> to believe it is not vanda
Speaking as an individual, although some of the things that motivated me
to actually go ahead and ask this question knowing that it might spark
discussion were conversations I had as DPL.
Obviously this question is motivated by things that happened last year,
but I'm not asking about that situati
21 matches
Mail list logo
