Post-Lenny discussions

Firstly, Yay Release [0]!!! Congrats to everyone, and particular to those people who have been up all night making this happen. Since Lenny has now been released I just wanted to briefly touch on the discussions which were postponed, so people know they are not being forgotten. As dato said[1], w

Re: Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:23:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > * Brainwash the libgd maintainers to obtain the [http://bugs.debian.org/443654 > removal of the "-noxpm"] packages (volunteer to do the transition: > CharlesPlessy). Save your soap/

Re: Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?

Le Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:39:47PM +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > > I suggested the creation of the DiscussionsAfterLenny wiki page a while > ago. Hi Adeodato, this is an excellent idea! Although top-down approaches are not really in Debian culture, since the paragraph 5.9 of our constitution

Re: Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?

On Tue Jan 13 20:50, Ian Jackson wrote: > We have a number of constitutional proposals: > > - Require Secretary to include position statement URLs in ballots > - Require Secretary to assist people with ballot drafting and >empower Secretary to briefly delay votes to do so > -

Re: Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?

Adeodato Simó writes ("Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?"): > It seems we have a number of projet-wide discussions that we've more or > less agreed to postpone until lenny is out. I have a moderate fear that > once that happens, they are going to explode (t

Re: Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?

On Tue Jan 13 17:39, Adeodato Simó wrote: > So, I'm interested in knowing if people would be fine with making a list > of these "big issues" we have to discuss, and trying to give them > "slots", as in putting them in some order that makes sense. Also, IMHO, > having one or two (per-topic) people "

Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?

Hm. It seems we have a number of projet-wide discussions that we've more or less agreed to postpone until lenny is out. I have a moderate fear that once that happens, they are going to explode (the discussions) all over the lists. I suggested the creation of the DiscussionsAfterLenny wiki page a