Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What are you talking about? This 'discussion' was started by
> Benjamin "Mako" Hill and the people who signed his 'pledge'. I was
> forced to respond, and as I noted in my first mail on the subject, I
> had not wanted to ever have to fight this battle.
Steve Langasek writes:
> Hmm, how do you measure that, exactly? Are you really meaning to say
> that Andrew's posts are directly contributing to a culture of witch
> hunts? Or are you really referring to some other standard of "making
> things worse" here?
Andrew's posts are making it easier for
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:46:11AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Andrew Suffield writes:
> > I really *don't care* what effect it has on me. The point is to show
> > how very bad their actions are, so that people don't ever do something
> > like this again. Debian does not need a culture of witchhun
Andrew Suffield writes:
> It seems to be working.
No it isn't. It's making things worse.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:25:52PM -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> On Aug 13 0:02+0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> > > For how long do we have to continue to wade through this flood of
> > > emails regarding the terrible state of hea
please stop, do not start a third thread about that.
I thought there were some common rules for flames we should try to
apply. IIRC during the DPL election, this was discussed a lot : should
we moderate lists ? or limit post numbers per DD ? the answer was : we
have to behave less childish, and
Eldon Koyle writes:
> I'll agree that the pledge to killfile you doesn't seem like the best
> solution...
This is the first I've heard of it. Not only is it not the best solution,
it's appalling. Andrew has been in my killfile for years, but he's coming
out now.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Aug 13 0:02+0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> > For how long do we have to continue to wade through this flood of
> > emails regarding the terrible state of heart of Andrew Suffield?
>
> Until people stop making accusations.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> For how long do we have to continue to wade through this flood of
> emails regarding the terrible state of heart of Andrew Suffield?
Until people stop making accusations.
> What
> is the ultimate purpose of this discussion?
I th
For how long do we have to continue to wade through this flood of
emails regarding the terrible state of heart of Andrew Suffield? What
is the ultimate purpose of this discussion? Do you think Jens
Schmalzing would have approved?
Mikael D.
stats.gif
Description: GIF image
10 matches
Mail list logo
