On Mon Aug 10 21:08, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> >> I think that's just you. There has been no decision by the project to
> >> change the license requirements for non-free, and if the ftp masters have
> >> decided this, they haven't disclosed it anywhere appropriate.
> > Indeed, last time I checked,
>> I think that's just you. There has been no decision by the project to
>> change the license requirements for non-free, and if the ftp masters have
>> decided this, they haven't disclosed it anywhere appropriate.
> Indeed, last time I checked, the requirement was that Debian is allowed
> to red
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 05:39:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:55PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > We need the redistribution bit, I don't think we need it to be allowed
> > > to be used by all users. Non-commercial is fine in non-free, or at
> > > least was,
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:55PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > We need the redistribution bit, I don't think we need it to be allowed
> > to be used by all users. Non-commercial is fine in non-free, or at
> > least was, last time I checked.
> I wouldn't be surprised if our requirements have
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Matthew Johnson
>
> | We would need a licence which allowed it to be redistributed by Debian
> | and used by all of our users. The reference for this is Debian Policy
> | 2.2.3 and 2.3:
>
> We need the redistribution bit, I don't think we need it
]] Matthew Johnson
| We would need a licence which allowed it to be redistributed by Debian
| and used by all of our users. The reference for this is Debian Policy
| 2.2.3 and 2.3:
We need the redistribution bit, I don't think we need it to be allowed
to be used by all users. Non-commercial is
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +0200, Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
> I will inform our lawers about your opinion. Really, it have a very big
> sense.
>
> I can say, that here in Opera we had discussions about being Free
> Software every year. Unfortunately, we have a lot of agreements with
> other
Dear Ilya,
Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
> Last 7 years I use GNU/Linux and know that, for example, in Russia the
> Opera browser is very popular in GNU/Linux Community. Unfortunately, not
> always I can see this browser in the non-free repos. Well, there is a
> question: whether Opera is included to you
On Wed Aug 05 19:13, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Last 7 years I use GNU/Linux and know that, for example, in Russia the
> > Opera browser is very popular in GNU/Linux Community. Unfortunately, not
> > always I can see this browser in the non-free repos. Well, there is a
> > question: whether Opera is
Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
> Thanks, Santiago!
>
> I will inform our lawers about your opinion. Really, it have a very big
> sense.
>
> I can say, that here in Opera we had discussions about being Free
> Software every year. Unfortunately, we have a lot of agreements with
> other companies which use O
Thanks, Santiago!
I will inform our lawers about your opinion. Really, it have a very big
sense.
I can say, that here in Opera we had discussions about being Free Software
every year. Unfortunately, we have a lot of agreements with other
companies which use Opera at their devices - by thi
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (Beware sarcasm tags might be missing.)
>
> Ana Guerrero (05/08/2009):
> > Even in the case you release the opera code with a license that allow
> > distributing opera in non-free, there is not much point on
> > distributing it wh
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work in Opera Software - yes, we make a proprietary browser ;)
>
> Last 7 years I use GNU/Linux and know that, for example, in Russia the
> Opera browser is very popular in GNU/Linux Community. Unfortunately, not
> always I can see this brows
(Beware sarcasm tags might be missing.)
Ana Guerrero (05/08/2009):
> Even in the case you release the opera code with a license that allow
> distributing opera in non-free, there is not much point on
> distributing it when we already have _totally free_ browsers.
There is: Linux is about Choice!
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:11:12PM +0200, Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work in Opera Software - yes, we make a proprietary browser ;)
>
> Last 7 years I use GNU/Linux and know that, for example, in Russia the
> Opera browser is very popular in GNU/Linux Community. Unfortunately, not
> always
Hi,
I work in Opera Software - yes, we make a proprietary browser ;)
Last 7 years I use GNU/Linux and know that, for example, in Russia the
Opera browser is very popular in GNU/Linux Community. Unfortunately, not
always I can see this browser in the non-free repos. Well, there is a
question: whe
16 matches
Mail list logo
