On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:03:06PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Does the project want to say that a DM is less trustworthy than a DD?
> > Yes, obviously. Just like a DM is more trustworthy than a non-DM.
>
> It would be more accurate to say that a DD is more *trusted* than a DM,
> and a DM i
On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 12:02 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:47:34AM +, Richard Hecker wrote:
> > Does the project want to say that a DM is less trustworthy than a DD?
> Yes, obviously. Just like a DM is more trustworthy than a non-DM.
It would be more accurate to
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:47:34AM +, Richard Hecker wrote:
> Does the project want to say that a DM is less trustworthy than a DD?
Yes, obviously. Just like a DM is more trustworthy than a non-DM.
> Should a DM becoming a DD be viewed as a promotion?
But it is, isn't it? Or, at least, as a n
Hi Charles,
While I understand the concern you're voicing, I think there's a part
that's missing here (and my apologies in advance for adding to the
mass of emails that has been going on recently).
To me, the difference between the DM and DD status stands on a matter
of trust in 3 components (tho
Hi all,
last month I expressed concerns related to the idea of demoting DDs to
DM status. I quote them at the end of the message for convenience.
Later, there has been a discussion on the theme that technical
excellence should not be a reason for tolerating misbehaviours
(https://lists.debian.or
5 matches
Mail list logo
