Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-04-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Patrick Ouellette writes ("MIA Maintainer Process Proposal"): > Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers. Can I make a suggestion for some `patter' that might be helpful ? Remember that the purpose of having an MIA maintainer procedure is not to punish develope

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-03-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 04:08:06PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Good guidelines. One point: we must always remember to check whether > > a maintainer has filled in the "On vacation" field in the DB. > > Occasionally, developers are forced to go on extended l

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-03-01 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > Good guidelines. One point: we must always remember to check whether > a maintainer has filled in the "On vacation" field in the DB. > Occasionally, developers are forced to go on extended leave (army > callups or similar). Some maintainer also forget to remove t

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-02-28 Thread Itai Zukerman
> > Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers. I'd like to see something in there about CC-ing debian-private on some of those E-mails. Other developers may have information about what's happened to the MIA. -itai

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-02-28 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:21:46PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Your times are completely absurd (no offense intended). Plus, I think > you forgot that if a maintainer emails saying "I > am going on a sabatical, I will be out for 6 months" they should get > some leeway. I just put some numbers

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-02-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:58:20PM -0500, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > > Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers. Good guidelines. One point: we must always remember to check whether a maintainer has filled in the "On vacation" field in the DB. Occasionally, developers are forced t

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-02-28 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:58:20PM -0500, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > > Suggested time / minimum activity guidelines: > > Package upload once in 4 months > or > Active on Debian lists / IRC channels in last 3 months. > Reasonable reply times for NMU: > > Security issues: immediate response ( < 2

MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-02-28 Thread Patrick Ouellette
Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers. Read, Relax, Enjoy.. At Nils' suggestion, I am posting my proposed guidelines for dealing with the MIA maintainer problem. There are a number of grey areas - particularly the length of time someone does respond to email and has not