Chris Pimlott wrote:
> Basically I only see this as making life more difficult by having
> packages jump between different groups when their releasing patterns
> change and having criterions to decide when a package has officially
> changed from fast to slow. This makes both hassle for main
Dividing packages by release schedule is not a great idea. Many
packages don't fall neatly into release schedule categories. A normally
"slow" release package may have many releases as it builds to a new major
version or experiences rapid bug fixes cause by a major overhaul, or a
normall
I started this conversation on Debian-Devel, got little response, and
then was told that it belonged on Debian-Project. So, I decided to bring
up my idea here.
In my previous email (Debian-Devel, subject "Debian Critical Mass") I
commented on how I believe that Debian has arrived at somewhat of a
3 matches
Mail list logo
