On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 04:47:23PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > I think this kind of historical document deserves noting in the
> > > Debian "history" pages; should I submit a bug report about that?
> >
> > No, because I already committed it in the project-history document CVS
> > :)
>
> Excell
Ben Finney wrote:
> On 13-Aug-2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Ben Finney wrote:
> > > I'm still looking for a single message (or other verifiably-dated
> > > document) that marks the "let's start Debian" from Ian Murdock.
> >
> > See here:
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CBusDD.MIK%40unix
On 14-Aug-2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:10:30PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I think this kind of historical document deserves noting in the
> > Debian "history" pages; should I submit a bug report about that?
>
> No, because I already committed it in the project-history do
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 01:15:10PM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
> It is funny to see that the first message about Debian contains the word
> flamewar on it. That means we were cursed from the beginning?
If you look at the message without the "gplain" output setting,
you'll notice that there were no
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:10:30PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > I'm still looking for a single message (or other verifiably-dated
> > > document) that marks the "let's start Debian" from Ian Murdock.
> >
> > See here:
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CBusDD.MIK%40unix.portal.com&oe=UTF-8
On 13-Aug-2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > I'm still looking for a single message (or other verifiably-dated
> > document) that marks the "let's start Debian" from Ian Murdock.
>
> See here:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CBusDD.MIK%40unix.portal.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gpla
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 14:00, Peter Makholm wrote:
> At least we got "Be warned that it will be rather large :)" right.
And the other foreshadowing comment:
"Please note that this release is not yet completed and may not be for
several more weeks"
er, maybe s/weeks/months/ now-a-days :)
-mike
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The "installation procedure that doesn't need to be babysat" and "system
> setup procedure that will attempt to setup and configure everything from
> fstab to Xconfig", on the other hand...
At least we got "Be warned that it will be rather large :)" ri
Hi,
It is funny to see that the first message about Debian contains the word
flamewar on it. That means we where cursed from the beginning?
Bye
Cesar Mendoza
http://www.kitiara.org
--
"Mi estrategia es / en cambio / más profunda y más / simple /
mi estrategia es / que un día cualquiera / no sé có
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:16:42AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Thanks for this :) It's inspiring to see that Debian started out as it
> goes on. It is worrying ,however, that it was intended to ease the burden
> for those without 'Net access. (As someone downloading nearly 3MB of
> packag
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:15:42AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> See here:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CBusDD.MIK%40unix.portal.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
>
> Regards,
>
> Joey
>
Joey,
Thanks for this :) It's inspiring to see that Debian started out as
it goes on. It is w
Ben Finney wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> With the upcoming Debian 10th Birthday event, I'm wondering if there is
> an inaugural email or some other document that marks the start of the
> Debian project, the way a certain email message from Linus Torvalds is
> frequently cited as the "public" beginning f
Howdy all,
With the upcoming Debian 10th Birthday event, I'm wondering if there is
an inaugural email or some other document that marks the start of the
Debian project, the way a certain email message from Linus Torvalds is
frequently cited as the "public" beginning for the Linux kernel.
Searchin
13 matches
Mail list logo
