On 2022-06-17 3:48 p.m., Luna Jernberg wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ansgar
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:33:39 +0200
> Subject: Re: Distrowatch
> To: steve , debian-project@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 10:37 -0400, stev
Hi,
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 10:37 -0400, steve wrote:
> Distrowatch has broken links to download Debian. Hope this is the
> right way to report it.
Please contact Distrowatch for problems with their web site. They seem
to have a contact address in their web site's footer.
Regards,
Ansgar
Distrowatch has broken links to download Debian. Hope this is the right
way to report it.
Thanks. Steve
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 09:27:59PM +0800, Cindy Hsieh wrote:
> It has been a policy of DistroWatch to list only default packages in
> the tables. The "About" page has some more information on the
> subject.
Thanks for the clarification.
I read ``as was kindly pointed ou
ut robust versions, and that
> sometimes the new versions do not act as plug-in replacements of the
> older.
It has been a policy of DistroWatch to list only default packages in the
tables. The "About" page has some more information on the subject.
Ladislav Bodnar
http://www.distrowatch.com
Hi Ladislav,
I noticed a couple of errors in the "latest versions" table for
Debian, mostly due to some versions being available as alternatives to
the versions in your listing. The main issues is that many of our
users do have a need for the older but robust versions, and that
sometimes the new
6 matches
Mail list logo
