On Saturday 05 August 2006 21:44, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> I don't really have strong feelings about maintaining some sort of
> purity of planet as for personal blogs.
>
> I do, however, don't want to do anything that sacrifices planets
> current role of providing a great personal space. I didn't t
> I'd prefer keeping PlanetDebian pure as a aggregator of personal blogs.
I don't really have strong feelings about maintaining some sort of
purity of planet as for personal blogs.
I do, however, don't want to do anything that sacrifices planets
current role of providing a great personal space.
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > OH YEAH!
> > >
> > > seconded++
> >
> > Ack, and when there are anyway changes on the way.. joeyh, how about
> > moving your upstream-planet[0] to something as
> > upstream.planet.debian.org (and DebianTimes/DWN to
> > {groups,teams,press,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:38:44PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060803 22:02]:
> > I'd prefer keeping PlanetDebian pure as a aggregator of personal blogs.
>
> Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased).
I agree with Frans. Planet Deb
* Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060804 17:57]:
> #include
> * Andreas Barth [Thu, Aug 03 2006, 09:33:03PM]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today, we launched a new service DebianTimes, times.debian.net. Its
> > intend is to deliver larger and smaller "nice items" to developers and
> > interested users.
>
>
#include
* Andreas Barth [Thu, Aug 03 2006, 09:33:03PM]:
> Hi,
>
> today, we launched a new service DebianTimes, times.debian.net. Its
> intend is to deliver larger and smaller "nice items" to developers and
> interested users.
Just a side note: I miss the usual big "go to the frontpage" link. T
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > OH YEAH!
> >
> > seconded++
>
> Ack, and when there are anyway changes on the way.. joeyh, how about
> moving your upstream-planet[0] to something as
> upstream.planet.debian.org (and DebianTimes/DWN to
> {groups,teams,press,$whatever}.planet.d.o
On 10736 March 1977, Andreas Barth wrote:
> After some more of the feedback, I decided to remove it from
> PlanetDebian. That same reason should IMHO also apply to removing the
> DebConf Blog (and not adding one for DebConf 7) and permanently removing
> DWN from PlanetDebian.
In future please do
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> OH YEAH!
>
> seconded++
Ack, and when there are anyway changes on the way.. joeyh, how about
moving your upstream-planet[0] to something as
upstream.planet.debian.org (and DebianTimes/DWN to
{groups,teams,press,$whatever}.planet.d.o or similar)?
[0]
http://people.debian.
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I'd prefer to keep Planet Debian for people, too, but it's not a *really*
> strong preference.
Me too. Neither DWN nor DebianTimes should, imho, be on planet.d.o.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Int
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060804 11:17]:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased).
> > >
> > > Anyways, if more DDs feel your way, I will remove DebianTimes. (DWN was
> > > removed due to flooding planet, not for "it's not a
Le ven 4 août 2006 11:17, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> pe, 2006-08-04 kello 10:52 +0200, Andreas Barth kirjoitti:
> > After some more of the feedback, I decided to remove it from
> > PlanetDebian. That same reason should IMHO also apply to removing
> > the DebConf Blog (and not adding one for DebConf
Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased).
> >
> > Anyways, if more DDs feel your way, I will remove DebianTimes. (DWN was
> > removed due to flooding planet, not for "it's not a personal blog, btw.)
>
> After some more of the feedback, I de
pe, 2006-08-04 kello 10:52 +0200, Andreas Barth kirjoitti:
> After some more of the feedback, I decided to remove it from
> PlanetDebian. That same reason should IMHO also apply to removing the
> DebConf Blog (and not adding one for DebConf 7) and permanently removing
> DWN from PlanetDebian.
Perh
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060803 22:39]:
> * Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060803 22:02]:
> > I'd prefer keeping PlanetDebian pure as a aggregator of personal blogs.
>
> Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased).
>
> Anyways, if more DDs feel your way, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/03/2006 05:38 PM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060803 22:02]:
>
>>I'd prefer keeping PlanetDebian pure as a aggregator of personal blogs.
>
>
> Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased)
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:38:44PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060803 22:02]:
> > I'd prefer keeping PlanetDebian pure as a aggregator of personal blogs.
>
> Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased).
>
> Anyways, if more DDs feel
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060803 22:02]:
> I'd prefer keeping PlanetDebian pure as a aggregator of personal blogs.
Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased).
Anyways, if more DDs feel your way, I will remove DebianTimes. (DWN was
removed due to flooding plane
On Thursday 03 August 2006 21:33, Andreas Barth wrote:
> DebianTimes is available as html-page and rss-feed. It has been added
> to PlanetDebian as well (except the syndicated weekly news).
If DebianTimes has its own rss-feed and is intended as a news service
rather than a blog, I don't feel it i
Hi,
today, we launched a new service DebianTimes, times.debian.net. Its
intend is to deliver larger and smaller "nice items" to developers and
interested users.
DebianTimes is available as html-page and rss-feed. It has been added to
PlanetDebian as well (except the syndicated weekly news). Debia
20 matches
Mail list logo
